From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: arm: increase priority of SGIs used as
 IPIs
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 11:34:08 +0000
Message-ID: <5326DDB0.3030706@linaro.org>
References: <1390927878-7048-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com>
	<5321A591.3030400@linaro.org>
	<1394714754.25873.61.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
	<5321AB04.1020809@linaro.org>
	<CAJEb2DH2-AAbZ5P_CrRbgCHg3m6DOicxErDoPLykWXoXZXpXRw@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1403161637260.30819@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
	<1395050521.4122.30.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
	<1395055741.4122.73.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1395055741.4122.73.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr.tyshchenko@globallogic.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Hi Ian,

On 03/17/2014 11:29 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 10:02 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Sun, 2014-03-16 at 16:38 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>>>> Hello, all.
>>>>
>>>> I tested this patch (with debug patch) when I was looking for solution
>>>> to fix "simultaneous cross-interrupts" (see 1.1):
>>>> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-01/msg02685.html
>>>> This patch didn't fix my issue.
>>>> When the solution was founded I forgot about this patch)
>>>>
>>>> Now I am using next solution:
>>>> http://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=139153089412362&w=2
>>>
>>> Speaking of which, it should probably be applied to xen-unstable now
>>> that the gate is open?
>>
>> Julien acked it but had a couple of minor comments which I wanted to
>> address today. I hope to repost later on.
> 
> Oh you meant the route irqs to dom0 patch in the link not the one in
> this thread. I'll pick that one up today as well I hope.

With the IPI patch, I don't think we need the route irqs to CPU0 patch
(at least for Xen 4.5). It would be better to backport it for Xen 4.4.

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall