From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/13] xen/passthrough: rework
 dom0_pvh_reqs to use it also on ARM
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:28:16 +0000
Message-ID: <53288230.1050708@linaro.org>
References: <1394552999-14171-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org>
	<1394552999-14171-6-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org>
	<1395159777.11824.4.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <julien.grall@linaro.org>) id 1WPxoK-0004Mr-Ec
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:28:20 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id bs8so2957057wib.1
	for <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>;
	Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1395159777.11824.4.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, tim@xen.org, Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Hi Ian,

On 03/18/2014 04:22 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-03-11 at 15:49 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
>> DOM0 on ARM will have the same requirements as DOM0 PVH when iommu is enabled.
>> Both PVH and ARM guest has paging mode translate enabled, so Xen can use it
>> to know if it needs to check the requirements.
>>
>> Rename the function and remove "pvh" word in the panic message.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
>> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>> Cc: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>
>>
>> ---
>>     Changes in v2:
>>         - IOMMU can be disabled on ARM if the platform doesn't have
>>         IOMMU.
>> ---
>>  xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c |   13 ++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
>> index c70165a..3c63f87 100644
>> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
>> @@ -130,13 +130,17 @@ int iommu_domain_init(struct domain *d)
>>      return hd->platform_ops->init(d);
>>  }
>>  
>> -static __init void check_dom0_pvh_reqs(struct domain *d)
>> +static __init void check_dom0_reqs(struct domain *d)
>>  {
>> -    if ( !iommu_enabled )
>> +    if ( !paging_mode_translate(d) )
>> +        return;
>> +
>> +    if ( is_pvh_domain(d) && !iommu_enabled )
> 
> Is is_pvh_domain going to be exposed to common code on ARM?

It will be exposed to common code. For now is_pvh_domain is part of
xen/sched.h, do you plan to move it in asm-x86?

> Or would a arch_check_dom0_reqs be useful here?

I will update patch #7 to create this function.

>>          panic("Presently, iommu must be enabled for pvh dom0\n");
>>  
>>      if ( iommu_passthrough )
>> -        panic("For pvh dom0, dom0-passthrough must not be enabled\n");
>> +        panic("Dom0 uses translate paging mode, dom0-passthrough must not be "
> 
> "paging translated mode" reads more natural to me.

I will change in the next version.

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall