From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] xen/xsm: Add support for device tree Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:20:59 +0000 Message-ID: <532C4ACB.9090003@linaro.org> References: <1395407109-19153-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> <1395407109-19153-4-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> <1395411176.19839.96.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WR0MF-00082J-MG for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:23:39 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id w61so1632888wes.18 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:21:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1395411176.19839.96.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Daniel De Graaf , tim@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Ian, On 03/21/2014 02:12 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 13:05 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: >> This patch adds a new module "xen,xsm-blob" to allow the user to load the XSM >> policy when Xen is booting. > > Why "xsm-blob" and not something descriptive like "xsm-policy"? Actually I didn't though about xsm-policy. Do you mind if I resend only this patch? I'm also wondering if I should #ifdef XSM_ENABLE this new part in common/device_tree.c Regards, -- Julien Grall