From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Ostrovsky Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] xen/libxc: Allow changing max number of hypervisor cpuid leaves Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:22:32 -0400 Message-ID: <532C5938.80402@oracle.com> References: <1395373911-4268-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> <1395373911-4268-2-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> <532C288D02000078001267A1@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <532C5710.7070007@oracle.com> <532C578202000078000AF429@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <532C578202000078000AF429@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: keir@xen.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, eddie.dong@intel.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, jun.nakajima@intel.com, yang.z.zhang@intel.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 03/21/2014 11:15 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> There are two things you want enforce >> - limit never becoming zero due to user override (at once taking >> care of the no override case) >> You think not having leaf 1 is something we should allow? I can see why >> 2 perhaps may be omitted. > If we force the lower limit that can be asked for to 1, leaf 1 will always > be visible. Oh, I clearly have issues with reading comprehension (among other things). Sorry. -boris