From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 10/10] xen/arm: GICv3 device tree parsing Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:03:26 +0000 Message-ID: <53301F0E.9030107@linaro.org> References: <1395238631-2024-1-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <1395238631-2024-11-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <532B127C.3030201@linaro.org> <1395661437.19365.66.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1395661437.19365.66.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Vijay Kilari , Stefano Stabellini , Prasun Kapoor , Vijaya Kumar K , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 03/24/2014 11:43 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > There is also the question of what guests use, which I suppose it mostly > the same as dom0, but without the expectation that the guest kernel has > to boot natively on a specific platform. > > I'm not sure what to suggest here, but I think for dom0 we can rely on > "dom0 kernel should be usable as a native kernel on this platform" and > we can punt for now on what to do about guests. As GICv3 is 64-bits only, that would mean you can't boot 32bit dom0 on this platform, right? -- Julien Grall