From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] arch, arm: let map_mmio_regions() take pfn as parameters Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:54:39 +0000 Message-ID: <53317C8F.5040404@linaro.org> References: <1395712976-19454-1-git-send-email-avanzini.arianna@gmail.com> <1395712976-19454-4-git-send-email-avanzini.arianna@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: julien.grall@citrix.com, paolo.valente@unimore.it, keir@xen.org, tim@xen.org, dario.faggioli@citrix.com, Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com, etrudeau@broadcom.com, JBeulich@suse.com, Arianna Avanzini , viktor.kleinik@globallogic.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Stefano and Arianna, On 03/25/2014 12:22 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> - return apply_p2m_changes(d, INSERT, start_gaddr, end_gaddr, >> - maddr, MATTR_DEV, p2m_mmio_direct); >> + return apply_p2m_changes(d, INSERT, >> + pfn_to_paddr(start_gfn), >> + pfn_to_paddr(end_gfn), >> + pfn_to_paddr(mfn), >> + MATTR_DEV, p2m_mmio_direct); >> } > > This doesn't make any sense. Shouldn't you modify apply_p2m_changes to > take pfns as parameters too? If so, I think it should be a separate patch. Her change makes sense with the current interface. Regards, -- Julien Grall