Re: [PATCH 4/7] xen: rename dom0 to hardware_domain

["Egger, Christoph" <chegger@amazon.de>]

On 27.03.14 13:48, Daniel De Graaf wrote:
> On 03/27/2014 08:20 AM, Egger, Christoph wrote:
>> On 27.03.14 12:52, Daniel De Graaf wrote:
>>> This should not change any functionality other than renaming the global
>>> variable.  In a few cases (primarily the domain building code), a local
>>> variable or argument named dom0 was created and used instead of the
>>> global hardware_domain to clarify that the domain being used in this
>>> case is actually domain 0.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
>>> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>>> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
>>> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>
>>> Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
>>> Cc: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Christoph Egger <chegger@amazon.de>
>>> Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>>> Cc: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>
>>
>> These changes are pretty mechanical.
>> I suppose you have code (or at least a plan) on top of
>> this patch? Is this a cleanup patch splitted out of it?
>>
>> Christoph
> 
> This is a part of a patch series that allows the hardware domain to be
> distinct from the domain with ID 0.  As part of this series, the "dom0"
> global variable now refers to the hardware domain, and as such, should
> not be named dom0.
> 
> You were CC'd on this patch because of the MAINTAINERS entry for mcheck.
> Actually, it looks like patch 1 of this series should also have cc'd
> you; I neglected to rerun get_maintainer.pl after expanding it.
> 

Ok. For the mcheck bits:
Acked-by: Christoph Egger <chegger@amazon.de>