From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Egger, Christoph" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] xen: rename dom0 to hardware_domain Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:46:51 +0100 Message-ID: <533447EB.6060707@amazon.de> References: <1395921128-7086-1-git-send-email-dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov> <1395921128-7086-5-git-send-email-dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov> <53341784.7030409@amazon.de> <53341E3A.3070903@tycho.nsa.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <53341E3A.3070903@tycho.nsa.gov> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Daniel De Graaf , xen-devel@lists.xen.org Cc: Liu Jinsong , Ian Campbell , Tim Deegan , Stefano Stabellini , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Xiantao Zhang List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 27.03.14 13:48, Daniel De Graaf wrote: > On 03/27/2014 08:20 AM, Egger, Christoph wrote: >> On 27.03.14 12:52, Daniel De Graaf wrote: >>> This should not change any functionality other than renaming the global >>> variable. In a few cases (primarily the domain building code), a local >>> variable or argument named dom0 was created and used instead of the >>> global hardware_domain to clarify that the domain being used in this >>> case is actually domain 0. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf >>> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich >>> Cc: Ian Campbell >>> Cc: Stefano Stabellini >>> Cc: Tim Deegan >>> Cc: Liu Jinsong >>> Cc: Christoph Egger >>> Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit >>> Cc: Xiantao Zhang >> >> These changes are pretty mechanical. >> I suppose you have code (or at least a plan) on top of >> this patch? Is this a cleanup patch splitted out of it? >> >> Christoph > > This is a part of a patch series that allows the hardware domain to be > distinct from the domain with ID 0. As part of this series, the "dom0" > global variable now refers to the hardware domain, and as such, should > not be named dom0. > > You were CC'd on this patch because of the MAINTAINERS entry for mcheck. > Actually, it looks like patch 1 of this series should also have cc'd > you; I neglected to rerun get_maintainer.pl after expanding it. > Ok. For the mcheck bits: Acked-by: Christoph Egger