From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH RFC 3/4] x86/AMD: support further
 feature masking MSRs
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 18:10:42 -0500
Message-ID: <533B4772.2020008@amd.com>
References: <532880230200007800125450@nat28.tlf.novell.com>	<53296E90020000780012593B@nat28.tlf.novell.com>	<532975D6020000780012598D@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<CAAAAutDJ3CzvGp9jWCS7=b3rQsG81+w_W7qXLKxDWB7QBU23DQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>) id 1WV7pY-0001C2-Lw
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2014 23:10:56 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAAAAutDJ3CzvGp9jWCS7=b3rQsG81+w_W7qXLKxDWB7QBU23DQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, ian.campbell@citrix.com, "Suthikulpanit,
	Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>, "Hurwitz,
	Sherry" <sherry.hurwitz@amd.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

> Newer AMD CPUs also allow masking CPUID leaf 6 ECX and CPUID leaf 7
> sub-leaf 0 EAX and EBX.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com <mailto:jbeulich@suse.com>>
>
> TBD:
> - Fam15M0x is documented to not have MSR C0011002 despite 
> CPUID[7,0].EBX != 0 from model 02
>   onwards, and contrary to what I see on the system I have access to 
> (which is model 02)
> - Fam12, Fam14, and Fam16 are documented to not have MSR C0011003 
> despite CPUID[6].ECX != 0

Fam10 too has cpuid[6].ecx != 0 but no MSR C0011003

> - Fam11 is documented to not even have MSR C0011004 and C0011005
>

I am still trying to get some clarity on this;
Shall let you know soon :)

-Aravind.