From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, tim@xen.org,
stefano.stabellini@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/16] xen/arm: IRQ: Store IRQ type in arch_irq_desc
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 17:06:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5342CD14.7050904@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1396883028.22845.124.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
On 04/07/2014 04:03 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> /*
>> * - needs to be called with a valid cpu_mask, ie each cpu in the mask has
>> + * - desc.lock must be held
>> * already called gic_cpu_init
>
> I think you've injected that line in the middle of a sentence ;-)
Oops right.
>> */
>> -static void gic_set_irq_properties(unsigned int irq, bool_t level,
>> +static void gic_set_irq_properties(struct irq_desc *desc,
>> const cpumask_t *cpu_mask,
>> unsigned int priority)
>> {
>> volatile unsigned char *bytereg;
>> uint32_t cfg, edgebit;
>> unsigned int mask;
>> + unsigned int irq = desc->irq;
>> + unsigned int type = desc->arch.type;
>> +
>> + ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&desc->lock));
>>
>> spin_lock(&gic.lock);
>>
>> @@ -240,7 +245,7 @@ static void gic_set_irq_properties(unsigned int irq, bool_t level,
>> /* Set edge / level */
>> cfg = GICD[GICD_ICFGR + irq / 16];
>> edgebit = 2u << (2 * (irq % 16));
>> - if ( level )
>> + if ( (type & DT_IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK) || (type == DT_IRQ_TYPE_NONE) )
>
> Is getting DT_IRQ_TYPE_NONE here not an error?
No, there is some DT like the exynos one which is using 0 (i.e
DT_IRQ_TYPE_NONE) for the IRQ type.
I guess we have to skip setting level/edge property in this case.
> Oh, I see this is the innards of dt_irq_is_level_triggered. Could that
> be refactored e.g. into dt_irq_type_is_level_triggered(const something
> type)?
I was wondering something like that instead:
if ( (type & DT_IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK) )
...
else if ( (type & DT_IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) )
...
So we skip the DT_IRQ_TYPE_NONE.
>
>> cfg &= ~edgebit;
>> else
>> cfg |= edgebit;
>
>> @@ -82,6 +83,12 @@ static int __cpuinit init_local_irq_data(void)
>> init_one_irq_desc(desc);
>> desc->irq = irq;
>> desc->action = NULL;
>> +
>> + /* PPIs are include in local_irqs, we have to copy the IRQ type from
>> + * CPU0 otherwise we may miss the type if the IRQ type has been
>> + * set early.
>> + */
>> + desc->arch.type = per_cpu(local_irq_desc, 0)[irq].arch.type;
>
> I thought we had a boot_cpu(foo) accessor, but I guess not (or at least
> I can't find it right now).
>
> That might be nicer to add than adding a hardcoded 0 (I suppose it isn't
> the only one though).
It's also used in mm.c when page tables is setup.
I will introduce boot_cpu macro.
>> @@ -379,6 +382,67 @@ void pirq_set_affinity(struct domain *d, int pirq, const cpumask_t *mask)
>> BUG();
>> }
>>
>> +static inline int irq_set_type(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int type)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int flags;
>> + int ret = -EBUSY;
>> +
>> + if ( type == DT_IRQ_TYPE_NONE )
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
>> +
>> + if ( desc->arch.type != DT_IRQ_TYPE_NONE && desc->arch.type != type )
>> + goto err;
>> +
>> + desc->arch.type = type;
>
> There was an open coded assignment in the guest path which unfortunately
> I already trimmed. Shouldn't that have all these checks too?
No, because with patch #11 the desc->arch.type is only set once by IRQ.
>> +
>> + ret = 0;
>> +
>> +err:
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +unsigned int platform_get_irq(const struct dt_device_node *device,
>> + int index)
>> +{
>> + struct dt_irq dt_irq;
>> + struct irq_desc *desc;
>> + unsigned int type, irq;
>> + int res;
>> +
>> + res = dt_device_get_irq(device, index, &dt_irq);
>> + if ( res )
>> + return 0;
>
> Not an error? Do we take precautions against IRQ0 being actually used
> somewhere?
Yes in gic_interrupt. do_IRQ is by-passed because IRQ 0 is a SGI.
> We should have an explicit #define for an invalid IRQ number.
I don't think it's useful because the device tree can't provide an IRQ
smaller than 16.
>> + irq = dt_irq.irq;
>> + type = dt_irq.type;
>> +
>> + /* Setup the IRQ type */
>> +
>> + if ( irq < NR_LOCAL_IRQS )
>> + {
>> + unsigned int cpu;
>> + /* For PPIs, we need to set IRQ type on every online CPUs */
>> + for_each_cpu( cpu, &cpu_online_map )
>> + {
>> + desc = &per_cpu(local_irq_desc, cpu)[irq];
>> + res = irq_set_type(desc, type);
>> + if ( res )
>> + return 0;
>
> Error?
>
> Also no need to undo any partial work?
desc->arch.type should be sync on every CPU. It would be crazy to have a
different IRQ type on every CPU.
> I haven't seen the caller yet, but for PPIs do we not get called for
> each CPU as it binds to the PPI anyway?
No, this function is only called once, when the DT is parsed at startup.
Basically, this function will replace dt_device_get_irq call.
>> + }
>> + }
>> + else
>> + {
>> + res = irq_set_type(irq_to_desc(irq), type);
>> + if ( res )
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return irq;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * Local variables:
>> * mode: C
>
>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h
>> index b52c26f..107c13a 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ struct arch_pirq
>>
>> struct arch_irq_desc {
>> int eoi_cpu;
>> + unsigned int type;
>
> I was wondering through the above if this ought to be a "bool_t level"
> or not. Thoughts?
We have 5 possibles types:
- default : we don't have to set the edge bit
- level high/low
- edge rising/falling
Even if GICv2 is only handling 2 types, it can change for the next
version of GIC.
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-07 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-03 20:41 [PATCH v2 00/16] Interrupt management reworking Julien Grall
2014-04-03 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] xen/arm: timer: replace timer_dt_irq by timer_get_irq Julien Grall
2014-04-07 13:10 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-07 13:24 ` Julien Grall
2014-04-03 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] xen/arm: IRQ: Use default irq callback from common code for no_irq_type Julien Grall
2014-04-07 13:10 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-03 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] xen/arm: IRQ: Rename irq_cfg into arch_irq_desc Julien Grall
2014-04-07 13:10 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-03 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] xen/arm: IRQ: move gic {, un}lock in gic_set_irq_properties Julien Grall
2014-04-03 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] xen/arm: IRQ: drop irq parameter in __setup_irq Julien Grall
2014-04-07 13:05 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-07 13:26 ` Julien Grall
2014-04-03 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] xen/arm: IRQ: remove __init from setup_dt_irq, request_dt_irq and release_irq Julien Grall
2014-04-07 13:11 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-03 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] xen/arm: IRQ: Move IRQ management from gic.c to irq.c Julien Grall
2014-04-07 13:07 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-07 13:34 ` Julien Grall
2014-04-03 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] xen/arm: IRQ Introduce irq_get_domain Julien Grall
2014-04-07 13:15 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-07 13:44 ` Julien Grall
2014-04-03 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] xen/arm: IRQ: Add lock contrainst for gic_irq_{startup, shutdown} Julien Grall
2014-04-07 13:27 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-07 14:45 ` Julien Grall
2014-04-03 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] xen/arm: IRQ: Don't need to have a specific function to route IRQ to Xen Julien Grall
2014-04-07 13:53 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-07 14:15 ` Julien Grall
2014-04-03 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] xen/arm: IRQ: Protect IRQ to be shared between domains and XEN Julien Grall
2014-04-07 14:46 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-07 14:53 ` Julien Grall
2014-04-07 15:12 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-07 15:32 ` Julien Grall
2014-04-03 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] xen/serial: remove serial_dt_irq Julien Grall
2014-04-07 14:49 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-03 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] xen/arm: IRQ: Store IRQ type in arch_irq_desc Julien Grall
2014-04-07 15:03 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-07 16:06 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2014-04-07 16:26 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-08 11:46 ` Julien Grall
2014-04-08 15:30 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-08 15:50 ` Julien Grall
2014-04-08 15:54 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-03 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] xen/arm: IRQ: Replace {request, setup}_dt_irq by {request, setup}_irq Julien Grall
2014-04-07 15:06 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-07 16:11 ` Julien Grall
2014-04-03 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] xen: IRQ: Add dev_id parameter to release_irq Julien Grall
2014-04-04 7:47 ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-04 8:39 ` Julien Grall
2014-04-07 15:08 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-03 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] xen/arm: IRQ: Handle multiple action per IRQ Julien Grall
2014-04-04 7:59 ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-04 8:52 ` Julien Grall
2014-04-04 9:00 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5342CD14.7050904@linaro.org \
--to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).