From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] xen/arm: register mmio handler at runtime Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:17:28 +0100 Message-ID: <5343CCB8.9040507@linaro.org> References: <1396612593-443-1-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <1396612593-443-2-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <533EA307.4000900@linaro.org> <533EACB0.6070604@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Vijay Kilari Cc: Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , Prasun Kapoor , Vijaya Kumar K , Andrii Anisov , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 04/08/2014 05:47 AM, Vijay Kilari wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> -const struct mmio_handler vgic_distr_mmio_handler = { >>>>> +static struct mmio_handler vgic_distr_mmio_handler = { >>>> >>>> Why did you remove the const? >>> >>> I think, compiler is allowing forward declaration with const >> >> You meant doesn't allow? If so, please move the whole structure. I'd >> prefer code movement rather than removing a const because of compiler issue. >> > Yes, compiler does not allow. I will move the code This is from the specification... if you declare something const you have to assign the value directly. >>> >>>> >>>> [..] >>>> >>>>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h >>>>> index 50b9b54..23dac85 100644 >>>>> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h >>>>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h >>>>> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct arch_domain >>>>> struct hvm_domain hvm_domain; >>>>> xen_pfn_t *grant_table_gpfn; >>>>> >>>>> + struct io_handler *io_handlers; >>>> >>>> Why do you need a pointer here? I think can can directly use >>>> struct io_handler iohandlers. >>>> >>> I just adds to increase the size of this arch_domain struct. >>> so allocated memory at runtime. >> >> Do you hit the page size? > Yes, I have faced page size exhausted issue which I have reported earlier Did you still have the issue when you moved out GICv stuff outside? Regards, -- Julien Grall