From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: HVM crash system on AMD APU A8-6600K Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:07:27 +0100 Message-ID: <5343F48F.6070602@eu.citrix.com> References: <52EF9EEF.8050301@citrix.com> <52EFA304.4000206@citrix.com> <52EFA87A.2000008@citrix.com> <20140203145503.GA3864@phenom.dumpdata.com> <52EFB9FA.7010905@oracle.com> <5343CCEC02000078000066F8@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5343CCEC02000078000066F8@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , Vitaliy Tomin Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Suravee Suthikulpanit List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 04/08/2014 09:18 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 07.04.14 at 17:36, wrote: >> Suravee / Jan -- any ideas here? > > Not really, particularly not without a place where one can easily > look up all relevant information in one go. I.e. I'm having trouble > collecting together > - the supposedly somewhere posted log with sync_console in place > - the response to Andrew's question what "whole system crashed" > means (since in the so far provided logs there's no sign of a crash) > - the answer to Sander's question regarding the behavior without > passing through the GPU > - _if_ there really is no crash, a log with "watchdog" also in place, > as also requested by (I think) Andrew at some point > > If an old thread gets resumed after a longer period of silence, I > think it would be very desirable if the reporter at least summarized > or directly linked to all previously collected information. FWIW, Vitaly first brought this up back in November, and then did summarize things, just as you describe, in the thread started in February. It came up again because I had marked the one back in November as "look at at some point", and asked him about it. :-) -George