From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] tools: arm: report an error if the guest RAM is too large Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 15:55:08 +0100 Message-ID: <53440DCC.6010002@linaro.org> References: <1396966739.22845.233.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <1396966760-7752-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1396966760-7752-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Ian, On 04/08/2014 03:19 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > diff --git a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h > index 7496556..dc11040 100644 > --- a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h > +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h > @@ -369,7 +369,8 @@ typedef uint64_t xen_callback_t; > #define GUEST_GICC_BASE 0x2c002000ULL > #define GUEST_GICC_SIZE 0x100ULL > > -#define GUEST_RAM_BASE 0x80000000ULL > +#define GUEST_RAM_BASE 0x80000000ULL /* 768M at 2GB*/ > +#define GUEST_RAM_END 0xafffffffULL I didn't catch this on the first read, every other pairs of define use _BASE AND _SIZE. Can you be consistent here? Regards, -- Julien Grall