From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matthew Rushton <mvrushton@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] page_alloc: use first half of higher
 order chunks when halving
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:20:26 -0700
Message-ID: <53484E8A.4020106@gmail.com>
References: <5332F948.1020909@gmail.com>
	<20140326163609.GD21368@phenom.dumpdata.com>
	<533312C0.1050507@gmail.com>
	<20140326175606.GA24179@phenom.dumpdata.com>
	<5333518E.40203@gmail.com>
	<20140328170201.GB12659@phenom.dumpdata.com>
	<5335F25F.9050309@gmail.com>
	<20140331141500.GB3159@phenom.dumpdata.com>
	<533A31B7.8090608@gmail.com>
	<20140401104825.GA5342@localhost.localdomain>
	<20140401122223.GA62612@deinos.phlegethon.org>
	<533B5732.6050001@gmail.com>
	<533BDDF0020000780000489C@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<1396433179.8667.292.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
	<533BFF7D02000078000049B8@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<1396434020.8667.300.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
	<5345C7F2.5050005@gmail.com>
	<534652FD0200007800007732@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <mvrushton@gmail.com>) id 1WYhw9-0007fl-Jh
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 20:20:33 +0000
Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id ma3so5853515pbc.27
	for <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>;
	Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <534652FD0200007800007732@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, AndrewCooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>, Matt Wilson <msw@linux.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 04/09/14 23:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 10.04.14 at 00:21, <mvrushton@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 04/02/14 03:20, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> Dom0 ballooning breaks any assumptions you might make about relying on
>>> early allocations.
>> I think you're missing the point. I'm not arguing that this change is a
>> general purpose solution to guarantee that dom0 is contiguous.
>> Fragmentation can exist even if dom0 asks for larger allocations like it
>> should (which the balloon driver does I believe). What the change does
>> do is solve a real problem in the current Linux PCI remapping
>> implementation which happens during dom0 intialization. If the
>> allocation strategy is arbitrary why not make the proposed hypervisor
>> change to make existing Linux implementations behave better and in
>> addition fix the problem in Linux so moving forward things are safe?
> Apart from all other arguments speaking against this, did you
> consider that altering the hypervisor behavior may adversely
> affect some other Dom0-capable OS?

Sure I've been considering the more intuitive dom0 implementation of 
allocating memory low to high and looking at things pragmatically.

>
> Problems in Linux should, as said before, get fixed in Linux. If
> older versions are affected, stable backports should subsequently
> be requested/done.
>
> Jan
>