From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [linux-linus test] 25478: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages] Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:53:19 +0100 Message-ID: <534E611F.2080607@citrix.com> References: <1394816855.6442.168.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <20140314182355.GA1051@phenom.dumpdata.com> <1395054505.4122.65.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <20140317193613.GA15772@phenom.dumpdata.com> <1395134987.18221.58.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <5328262D.7040005@citrix.com> <1395140645.12847.38.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <1395141039.12847.42.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <53282D25.10203@citrix.com> <1395142154.12847.46.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <53283118.5050706@citrix.com> <1395143026.12847.47.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <21318.47805.299794.184727@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <21326.22411.100506.216230@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <21326.22411.100506.216230@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: Boris.Ostrovsky@oracle.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 16/04/14 11:12, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 25478: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages]"): >> xen.org writes ("[linux-linus test] 25677: regressions - FAIL"): >>> flight 25677 linux-linus real [real] >>> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/25677/ >>> >>> Regressions :-( >>> >>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, >>> including tests which could not be run: >>> test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557 >> >> This is still failing with zillions of this message >> Mar 27 12:25:48.036598 [ 850.054546] mptsas 0000:03:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full >> >> Are we any closer to figuring out how to get a fix for this past the >> x86 maintainers ? >> >> Does the Linux kernel not have a "no regressions" policy ? This is a >> regression, after all... > > Another week has gone by and Linux tip still fails this test. Yes, You've not fixed it yet. David