From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] fixes (read: workarounds) for XSA-59 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:58:39 +0100 Message-ID: <534E8C8F.1020407@citrix.com> References: <534EA56E020000780000984D@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WaQMh-0005L5-NW for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:59:03 +0000 In-Reply-To: <534EA56E020000780000984D@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Keir Fraser , Tim Deegan , Ian Jackson , Donald D Dugger , Ian Campbell , Jun Nakajima , xen-devel , xiantao.zhang@intel.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 16/04/14 14:44, Jan Beulich wrote: > Finally, after a long period of silence and then back and forth, here is > what came out of the discussion with Intel. > > 1: VT-d: suppress UR signaling for server chipsets > 2: VT-d: suppress UR signaling for desktop chipsets > 3: passthrough: allow to suppress SERR and PERR signaling altogether > > v2: Only a relatively minor change to patch 3; patches 1 and 2 are > unchanged, but I would hope the resend helps to remind namely > Intel that those two want their ack. There are common code > changes here too, for which I'll need an ack from one of the other > committers too. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich All Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel