From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wei Huang Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/6] xen/arm: Support guest VM save/restore/migration Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:41:57 -0500 Message-ID: <534EB2D5.8040308@samsung.com> References: <1397595918-30419-1-git-send-email-w1.huang@samsung.com> <534EAFD3.8090503@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <534EAFD3.8090503@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Julien Grall Cc: ian.campbell@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, jaeyong.yoo@samsung.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, yjhyun.yoo@samsung.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 04/16/2014 11:29 AM, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Wei, > > On 04/15/2014 10:05 PM, Wei Huang wrote: >> This series is RFC v2 for save/restore/migration. The following >> areas have been addressed: >> * save and restore of guest states is split into specific areas (and files) >> * get XENMEM_maximum_gpfn is now supported via P2M max_mapped_gfn. >> * name and layout of some functions >> * small areas commented by Julien Grall and Andrew Cooper > > > While I was reading the series I found some comments about the > restriction of the solution (amount of RAM, SMP...). Can you write down > in a same place what's need to done? what is working currently?... > OK. The best candidate for common place would be in the cover letter. Or you have other preferences? > Thanks, >