From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/18] xen/arm: IRQ: Handle multiple action per IRQ Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:22:45 +0100 Message-ID: <534FB985.7010606@linaro.org> References: <1396968247-8768-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> <1396968247-8768-19-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> <1397663693.24638.226.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <534EAA6C.9070601@linaro.org> <1397665048.24638.237.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <534EAE7C.7090609@linaro.org> <534F99C90200007800009DAE@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <534FAEC6.9070303@linaro.org> <534FD3FB0200007800009F41@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WakP2-0001VF-HR for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:22:48 +0000 Received: by mail-ee0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e53so538316eek.16 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 04:22:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <534FD3FB0200007800009F41@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Keir Fraser , stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, Ian Campbell , tim@xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 04/17/2014 12:15 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 17.04.14 at 12:36, wrote: >> In Linux case, they are safe because they are using a single linked list. > > And is there a strong reason for us to use a doubly linked one? My first version was single-linked list... Ian asked me to use generic list on V1 to avoid open code. I was looking to port llist.h from Linux but it seems a bit overkill for action list. I'm happy to move back to my first solution with a "next" field (see https://patches.linaro.org/23687/). Regards, -- Julien Grall