From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Ostrovsky Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Time-related fixes for migration Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:30:17 -0400 Message-ID: <534FD769.3060407@oracle.com> References: <1397689165-5242-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> <534FA3080200007800009E08@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <534FA3080200007800009E08@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, eddie.dong@intel.com, jun.nakajima@intel.com, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 04/17/2014 03:46 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 17.04.14 at 00:59, wrote: >> Version 5: >> * Fixed checks in tsc_set_info to make sure that PV works. >> >> The fix also covers PVH case although after having a quick look at PVH >> support wrt time/TSC it's pretty clear that more work needs to be done. >> For example, PVH doesn't appear to touch TSC offsets in VMCB, it uses > PVH and VMCB (i.e. SVM) don't work together anyway. > I meant VMCS. -boris