From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/3] x86/hvm: Indicate avaliability of HW
 support of APIC virtualization to HVM guests
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 09:27:53 -0400
Message-ID: <5357BFD9.6050206@oracle.com>
References: <1398194263-21858-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
	<1398194263-21858-4-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
	<5357A781020000780000B44E@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <5357A781020000780000B44E@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, eddie.dong@intel.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, yang.z.zhang@intel.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 04/23/2014 05:44 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 22.04.14 at 21:17, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
>> +void vmx_hypervisor_cpuid_leaf(uint32_t sub_idx,
>> +                               uint32_t *eax, uint32_t *ebx,
>> +                               uint32_t *ecx, uint32_t *edx)
>> +{
>> +    if ( sub_idx != 0 )
>> +        return;
>> +printk("cpu_has_vmx_apic_reg_virt=0x%x
>> cpu_has_vmx_virtualize_x2apic_mode=0x%x cpu_has_vmx_apic_reg_virt=0x%x
>> cpu_has_vmx_virtual_intr_delivery=0x%x\n", cpu_has_vmx_apic_reg_virt,
>> cpu_has_vmx_virtualize_x2apic_mode, cpu_has_vmx_apic_reg_virt,
>> cpu_has_vmx_virtual_intr_delivery);
> Urgh?!
>
> Jan
>

<blush>

I'll fix this after Intel folks comment on this patch.


-boris