From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars Kurth Subject: Re: Cleaning up user confusion about different virt modes in Xen Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 11:29:29 +0100 Message-ID: <5370A289.5000004@xen.org> References: <536B642C.2010104@xen.org> Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <536B642C.2010104@xen.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Russell Pavlicek List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org No views then? In this case, I think it makes sense to start using Brendan's terminology in wiki docs Also see http://brendangregg.com/blog/2014-05-09/xen-feature-detection.html Lars On 08/05/2014 12:02, Lars Kurth wrote: > Folks, > > have a look at > http://brendangregg.com/blog/2014-05-07/what-color-is-your-xen.html > ... It's a well made case about the confusion our terminology has > created in user-land. Admittedly, it was a lot worse before we came up > with the virtualization spectrum. But since then ARM created extra > complexity. > > The article makes some very good points, and a sensible solution, but > also throws up new problems. Maybe it is time to clean up the > confusion in terminology, use it consistently and fix our documentation. > > But before we consider this, I wanted put the article up for debate > > Best Regards > Lars > >