From: Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/passthrough: Prevent QEMU from mapping PCI option ROM at address 0
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 14:26:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5370CC22.6020408@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5370E44102000078000116AD@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 12/05/14 14:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 12.05.14 at 14:42, <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com> wrote:
>> The PCI option ROM BAR uses the LSB to indicate if the BAR is enabled.
>> The AMD graphics driver sets the address bit's of the BAR to 0 but leaves the
>> LSB set to 1. Whilst this is not good practice, QEMU should be ignoring the
>> non address parts of the BAR.
>>
>> This patch adds masking of the non address parts of the BAR before comparing
>> the address to 0.
>> ---
>> hw/pass-through.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/pass-through.c b/hw/pass-through.c
>> index 304c438..7d6aefc 100644
>> --- a/hw/pass-through.c
>> +++ b/hw/pass-through.c
>> @@ -2208,7 +2208,7 @@ static void pt_bar_mapping_one(struct pt_dev *ptdev, int bar, int io_enable,
>> }
>>
>> /* prevent guest software mapping memory resource to 00000000h */
>> - if ((base->bar_flag == PT_BAR_FLAG_MEM) && (r_addr == 0))
>> + if ((base->bar_flag == PT_BAR_FLAG_MEM) && ((r_addr & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK) == 0))
>
> You talk of the low bit, but mask off the low 4 - how does that fit
> together? Didn't you rather mean PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK &
> ~PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE in text and code?
The description provides an example of a driver setting the lower bits
of the BAR.
The intent of the fix is to ensure no BAR is mapped address 0 which is
achieved by ensuring only the address bits of the BAR are used for the
comparison with 0.
Malcolm
> Jan
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-12 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-12 12:42 [PATCH] hw/passthrough: Prevent QEMU from mapping PCI option ROM at address 0 Malcolm Crossley
2014-05-12 13:09 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-12 13:26 ` Malcolm Crossley [this message]
2014-05-12 13:34 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-12 13:55 ` Malcolm Crossley
2014-05-12 14:00 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-12 13:17 ` Ian Campbell
2014-05-12 13:31 ` Malcolm Crossley
2014-05-12 13:36 ` Ian Campbell
2014-05-12 13:52 ` Paul Durrant
2014-05-12 15:18 ` Ian Jackson
2014-05-12 15:48 ` Malcolm Crossley
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-12 14:31 Malcolm Crossley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5370CC22.6020408@citrix.com \
--to=malcolm.crossley@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).