From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/9] x86/misc: Early cleanup
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 11:38:12 +0100
Message-ID: <53749914.4090708@citrix.com>
References: <1400147299-31772-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
	<1400147299-31772-5-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
	<5374B3C702000078000128C7@mail.emea.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <5374B3C702000078000128C7@mail.emea.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 15/05/14 11:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 15.05.14 at 11:48, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> * machine_restart() disables the watchdog itself, covering itself from other
>>   callers.  Drop superfluous braces and watchdog_disable() from panic().
> Hmm, panic() is common code, and machine_restart()'s property of
> calling watchdog_disable() is x86-specific. I realize that ARM just
> doesn't have a watchdog right now, but do we really want to make
> it a requirement that each watchdog-capable arch does that in
> machine_restart()? Otoh an arch that can tolerate its watchdog
> being disabled over the restart attempt would then not get this
> enforced onto it (in which case only the description above would need
> a little tweaking).

machine_halt() needs just as much watchdog intervention as
machine_restart(), yet that was asymmetric.

I would argue that it is up to the arch to know whether playing with the
watchdog is needed for these things.

>
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
>> @@ -375,21 +375,18 @@ void vcpu_show_execution_state(struct vcpu *v)
>>      vcpu_unpause(v);
>>  }
>>  
>> -static char *trapstr(int trapnr)
>> -{
>> -    static char *strings[] = { 
>> -        "divide error", "debug", "nmi", "bkpt", "overflow", "bounds", 
>> -        "invalid opcode", "device not available", "double fault", 
>> -        "coprocessor segment", "invalid tss", "segment not found", 
>> -        "stack error", "general protection fault", "page fault", 
>> -        "spurious interrupt", "coprocessor error", "alignment check", 
>> +static const char *trapstr(unsigned int trapnr)
>> +{
>> +    static char *strings[] = {
> If you already touch this, and if you already make the function
> return const char *, then this also wants to become const char *const.
>
> Jan
>

Will do.

~Andrew