From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Ostrovsky Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/19] x86/PMU: Xen PMU PV(H) support Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 10:57:52 -0400 Message-ID: <53762770.8070206@oracle.com> References: <1399996413-1998-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> <5375DD020200007800012E60@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5375DD020200007800012E60@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, keir@xen.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, donald.d.dugger@intel.com, jun.nakajima@intel.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 05/16/2014 03:40 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 13.05.14 at 17:53, wrote: >> * Replaced references to dom0 with hardware_domain (and is_control_domain with >> is_hardware_domain for consistency) > I hope this wasn't a blind replacement - there are certainly cases where > is_control_domain() is warranted to remain for documentation purposes. There were 2 or 3 instances that were replaced: it used for determining who controls system's PMU in privileged profiling mode. -boris