From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>,
keir@xen.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] xen: free_domheap_pages: delay page scrub to tasklet
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 10:14:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537ABA84.9030801@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537A086F02000078000138C7@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 05/19/2014 07:34 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 19.05.14 at 04:57, <lliubbo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This patch try to delay scrub_one_page() to a tasklet which will be
>> scheduled on
>> all online physical cpus, so that it's much faster to return from 'xl/xm
>> destroy xxx'.
>
> At the price of impacting all other guests. I think this is too simplistic
> an approach. For one, I think the behavior ought to be configurable
> by the admin: Deferring the scrubbing means you can't use the
> memory for creating a new guest right away. And then you should
> be doing this only on idle CPUs, or (with care not to introduce
> security issues nor exhaustion of the DMA region) on CPUs actively
> requesting memory, where the request can't be fulfilled without using
> some of the not yet scrubbed memory.
>
> And btw., 10 min of cleanup time for 1Tb seems rather much
> independent of the specific scrubber behavior - did you check
> whether decreasing the rate at which relinquish_memory() calls
> hypercall_preempt_check() wouldn't already reduce this be quite
> a bit?
>
I tried to call hypercall_preempt_check() every 10000 page, but the time
didn't get any reduced.
--
Regards,
-Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-20 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-19 2:57 [RFC PATCH] xen: free_domheap_pages: delay page scrub to tasklet Bob Liu
2014-05-19 9:59 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-05-19 10:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-05-19 11:34 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-20 2:14 ` Bob Liu [this message]
2014-05-20 6:27 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-20 7:11 ` Bob Liu
2014-05-20 7:26 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-20 8:14 ` Bob Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=537ABA84.9030801@oracle.com \
--to=bob.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=lliubbo@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).