From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Yang Z Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Donald D Dugger <donald.d.dugger@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] VT-d: honor firmware-first mode in XSA-59 workaround code
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 10:34:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537DC4AC.4030505@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537DBFB00200007800014C79@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 22/05/14 08:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 21.05.14 at 18:33, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 21/05/14 17:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> When firmware-first mode is being indicated by firmware, we shouldn't
>>> be modifying AER registers - these ar considered to be owned by
>> "these are"
>>
>>> firmware in that case. Violating this is being reported to result in
>>> SMI (or was it SCI?) storms.
>> SMM livelock.
> IOW "SMI storm".
It wasn't completely clear from the BIOS engineer's description whether
it was a single infinite loop in SMM mode, or an SMI storm, but the
overall effects are still the same.
>
>> The exact problem was a 2.6.32 kernel ignoring firmware-first and
>> disabling reporting on the root ports but not endpoint devices, causing
>> the SMM handler to fail to find the issue, and fail to clear the SMI.
>>
>> However, as part of the investigation, we identified that Xen was also
>> violating firmware-first as part of XSA-59
> So has a problem solely with the XSA-59 workaround (i.e. without an
> ignorant kernel) then been observed at all?
>
> Jan
>
Correct
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-22 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-21 16:09 [PATCH RFC] VT-d: honor firmware-first mode in XSA-59 workaround code Jan Beulich
2014-05-21 16:33 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-05-22 7:13 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-22 9:34 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2014-05-22 10:06 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-22 10:19 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-05-22 10:33 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-22 14:19 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-05-23 1:03 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-05-23 6:13 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-23 6:40 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-05-23 2:32 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-05-23 6:22 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-23 6:46 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-05-23 7:15 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-26 0:39 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-05-26 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 " Jan Beulich
2014-06-03 14:38 ` Malcolm Crossley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=537DC4AC.4030505@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=donald.d.dugger@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=malcolm.crossley@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).