From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: julien.grall@citrix.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] xen/arm: ignore guest writes to GICD_ITARGETSR for SPIs
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 17:25:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538DF70A.3090306@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401811627-4389-1-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Hi Stefano,
On 06/03/2014 05:07 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Ignore guest writes to GICD_ITARGETSR that set the target cpu to a cpu
> other than cpu0 for SPIs.
>
> Also ignore guest writes to GICD_ITARGETSR for PPIs and SGIs as they can
> only be delivered to the same cpu and that has already been configured
> at initialization time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - ignore writes to rank 0;
> - don't print a warning for ignoring writes to GICD_ITARGETSR;
> - add a comment in the code to remember that we don't implement writes
> to GICD_ITARGETSR.
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/vgic.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
> index cb8df3a..1304b5e 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
> @@ -584,6 +584,13 @@ static int vgic_distr_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info)
> if ( dabt.size != 0 && dabt.size != 2 ) goto bad_width;
> rank = vgic_irq_rank(v, 8, gicd_reg - GICD_ITARGETSR);
> if ( rank == NULL) goto write_ignore;
> + /* only same vcpu delivery can be allowed for PPIs and SGIs */
> + if ( REG_RANK_NR(8, gicd_reg - GICD_ITARGETSR) == 0 )
> + return 1;
This test is wrong. PPIs and SGIs are already a preset value (see
vcpu_vgic_init).
Futhermore, there is already a specific case for PPIs and SGIs (see few
lines above).
> + /* SPI delivery to secondary vcpus is unimplemented */
> + if ( REG_RANK_NR(8, gicd_reg - GICD_ITARGETSR) > 0 &&
> + *r != (1|1<<8|1<<16|1<<24) )
> + return 1;
You don't handle byte-access here. Rather than testing the value, I
think it's fine to return unconditionally.
> vgic_lock_rank(v, rank);
> if ( dabt.size == 2 )
> rank->itargets[REG_RANK_INDEX(8, gicd_reg - GICD_ITARGETSR)] = *r;
>
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-03 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-03 16:04 [PATCH v2 0/2] vgic emulation and GICD_ITARGETSR Stefano Stabellini
2014-06-03 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] xen/arm: ignore guest writes to GICD_ITARGETSR for SPIs Stefano Stabellini
2014-06-03 16:23 ` Ian Campbell
2014-06-03 16:25 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2014-06-03 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] xen/arm: observe itarget setting in vgic_enable_irqs and vgic_disable_irqs Stefano Stabellini
2014-06-03 16:33 ` Julien Grall
2014-06-06 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] vgic emulation and GICD_ITARGETSR Ian Campbell
2014-06-06 16:32 ` Ian Campbell
2014-06-09 10:41 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-06-10 11:16 ` Ian Campbell
2014-06-10 14:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=538DF70A.3090306@linaro.org \
--to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).