Re: [Need Input] (informal) Automotive PV drivers subproject request

[Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xen.org>]

On 09/06/2014 13:30, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 13:25 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
>> On 09/06/2014 11:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Sat, 7 Jun 2014, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>>>>>>> Officially supported Xen Project repositories should only depend on
>>>>>>> *upstreams* (Xen, Linux, ...). As we are talking about
>>>>>>> git://xenbits.xen.org/pvdrivers.git here (as suggested by Aertem),
>>>>>>> whatever is in that repo (owned by a subproject) should build and work
>>>>>>> with vanilla Xen and Linux.
>>>>>> Is this pvdrivers.git going to be a descendent (e.g. a git clone) of
>>>>>> xen.git? Or is it a fresh repository which contains this new set of
>>>>>> drivers which do not have a home in xen.git?
>>>>> pvdrivers.git shall not be a clone for xen.git. Indeed, it is a set of
>>>>> drivers that, as you said, do not have a home in xen.git or kernel.git
>>>>>
>>>> Indeed. What I've got in mind is something like the following:
>>>>
>>>> xenbits.org/[artem?]/xen-automotive.git  integration tree
>> I am assuming xen-automotive.git = xen.git with hacks (as a staging tree)
>> So wouldn't it be better the to have
>> xenbits/people/automotive/artem?/xen.git instead of a renamed tree?
> Please can we keep subproject names out of the people namespace, it's
> just confusing things (i.e. is that an official repo of some sort or
> not?). /people/artem/xen.git is perfectly fine as a name for Artem's
> repo.

/people/artem/xen.git is fine with me.
Lars