From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] xen/arm: support irq delivery to vcpu > 0 Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:56:41 +0100 Message-ID: <53970089.3050402@linaro.org> References: <1402076908-26740-3-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> <1402402587.1250.81.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1402402587.1250.81.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini Cc: julien.grall@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/10/2014 01:16 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > Does this do the right thing for PPIs? vgic_get_target_vcpu will just > lookup vcpu0's target, not the actual expected target, won't it? > (something else must deal with this, or it'd be broken already I > suppose) physical PPIs can't be routed to the guest. We don't have any support for this such things and adding it will be a nightmare (a guest with more VCPUs than the pCPUs...). Regards, -- Julien Grall