From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, keir@xen.org,
suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, tim@xen.org,
dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
jun.nakajima@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/19] x86/VPMU: Add public xenpmu.h
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 08:32:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53984C5E.30406@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <539845A40200007800019D2B@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 06/11/2014 06:03 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 06.06.14 at 19:40, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
>> @@ -228,6 +229,10 @@ void vpmu_initialise(struct vcpu *v)
>> struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(v);
>> uint8_t vendor = current_cpu_data.x86_vendor;
>>
>> + BUILD_BUG_ON((sizeof(struct xen_pmu_intel_ctxt) > XENPMU_CTXT_PAD_SZ) ||
>> + (sizeof(struct xen_pmu_amd_ctxt) > XENPMU_CTXT_PAD_SZ));
> This should be two BUILD_BUG_ON()s, so that if one triggers there's
> no ambiguity in which of the structures grew too large.
>
>> +struct xen_pmu_amd_ctxt {
>> + uint32_t counters; /* Offset to counter MSRs */
>> + uint32_t ctrls; /* Offset to control MSRs */
> Offsets relative to what?
Relative to context union of xen_arch_pmu (i.e. xen_pmu_amd_ctxt). I'll
add a comment.
>
>> +struct xen_pmu_intel_ctxt {
>> + uint64_t global_ctrl;
>> + uint64_t global_ovf_ctrl;
>> + uint64_t global_status;
>> + uint64_t fixed_ctrl;
>> + uint64_t ds_area;
>> + uint64_t pebs_enable;
>> + uint64_t debugctl;
>> + uint32_t fixed_counters; /* Offset to fixed counter MSRs */
>> + uint32_t arch_counters; /* Offset to architectural counter MSRs */
> Same question here.
>
>> +struct xen_arch_pmu {
>> + union {
>> + struct cpu_user_regs regs;
>> + uint8_t pad[256];
>> + } r;
>> + union {
>> + uint32_t lapic_lvtpc;
>> + uint64_t pad;
>> + } l;
>> + union {
>> + struct xen_pmu_amd_ctxt amd;
>> + struct xen_pmu_intel_ctxt intel;
>> +#define XENPMU_CTXT_PAD_SZ 128
>> + uint8_t pad[XENPMU_CTXT_PAD_SZ];
> So assuming the variable size MSR arrays follow here, is 128 enough
> for forward compatibility? Or is 128 indeed only expected to cover the
> fixed size base structures (whichever way it is should perhaps be
> made explicit by way of adding a comment)?
128 is for fixed part only (which is currently 64 bytes Intel, which is
larger). Will add a comment.
-boris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-11 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-06 17:39 [PATCH v7 00/19] x86/PMU: Xen PMU PV(H) support Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 17:39 ` [PATCH v7 01/19] common/symbols: Export hypervisor symbols to privileged guest Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 17:57 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-06-06 19:05 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 19:13 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-06-10 11:31 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-06 17:39 ` [PATCH v7 02/19] VPMU: Mark context LOADED before registers are loaded Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 17:59 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-06-10 15:29 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-10 15:40 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 17:39 ` [PATCH v7 03/19] x86/VPMU: Set MSR bitmaps only for HVM/PVH guests Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 18:02 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-06-06 19:07 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v7 04/19] x86/VPMU: Make vpmu marcos a bit more efficient Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 18:13 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-06-06 19:28 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v7 05/19] intel/VPMU: Clean up Intel VPMU code Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 18:34 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-06-06 19:43 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-10 8:19 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v7 06/19] vmx: Merge MSR management routines Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-11 9:55 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v7 07/19] x86/VPMU: Handle APIC_LVTPC accesses Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v7 08/19] intel/VPMU: MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL should be initialized to zero Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v7 09/19] x86/VPMU: Add public xenpmu.h Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 19:32 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-06-11 10:03 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-11 12:32 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2014-06-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v7 10/19] x86/VPMU: Make vpmu not HVM-specific Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-11 10:07 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-11 13:57 ` Is: Reviewed-by, Acked-by rules. Was:Re: " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-11 20:25 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-12 11:10 ` George Dunlap
2014-06-12 16:21 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v7 11/19] x86/VPMU: Interface for setting PMU mode and flags Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 19:58 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-06-06 20:42 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-11 10:14 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-17 15:01 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-17 15:14 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v7 12/19] x86/VPMU: Initialize PMU for PV guests Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 20:13 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-06-06 20:49 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-11 10:20 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-11 12:49 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-11 12:53 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v7 13/19] x86/VPMU: Add support for PMU register handling on " Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 20:26 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-06-06 20:53 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v7 14/19] x86/VPMU: Handle PMU interrupts for " Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 20:40 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-06-06 21:21 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v7 15/19] x86/VPMU: Merge vpmu_rdmsr and vpmu_wrmsr Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v7 16/19] x86/VPMU: Add privileged PMU mode Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v7 17/19] x86/VPMU: Save VPMU state for PV guests during context switch Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v7 18/19] x86/VPMU: NMI-based VPMU support Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v7 19/19] x86/VPMU: Move VPMU files up from hvm/ directory Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-06 21:05 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53984C5E.30406@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).