From: Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Ian.Jackson@citrix.com, Paul.Durrant@citrix.com,
Ian.Campbell@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] hw/passthrough: Prevent QEMU from mapping PCI option ROM at address 0
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:49:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A071AE.80709@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5371D8D20200007800011A68@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 13/05/14 07:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 12.05.14 at 17:59, <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 12/05/14 16:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 12.05.14 at 17:36, <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> The PCI option ROM BAR uses the LSB to indicate if the BAR is enabled.
>>>> The AMD graphics driver sets the address bit's of the BAR to 0 but leaves
>>>> the
>>>> LSB set to 1. Whilst this is not good practice, QEMU should be ignoring the
>>>> non address parts of the BAR.
>>>
>>> All you say above only warrants the PCI defined bits to be masked
>>> off, ...
>>>
>>
>> But we've only got 4k mapping granularity with the IOMMU, so if we try
>> to map to an address between 2k and 4k then we will overlap with the
>> bottom 2k which is likely to cause problems.
>
> What has the IOMMU got to do with this? Any such overlap would
> be similarly (non-)problematic elsewhere in the address space.
>
Sorry it took so long to reply to this. I wrongly said the IOMMU was
responsible for VM outbound mappings.
The 4k restriction is still there because QEMU uses the
xc_domain_memory_mapping function (see pt_iomem_map in qemu-trad) to
create the VM outbound mapping to the option ROM BAR. So you still have
a functional problem is the guest tries to map the option ROM to address
> 2k && < 4k because then the guest cannot access RAM at address < 2k
due to the option ROM outbound mapping overlaps that region.
Malcolm
> Jan
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-17 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-12 15:36 [PATCH v4] hw/passthrough: Prevent QEMU from mapping PCI option ROM at address 0 Malcolm Crossley
2014-05-12 15:52 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-12 15:59 ` Malcolm Crossley
2014-05-13 6:33 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-17 16:49 ` Malcolm Crossley [this message]
2014-06-18 11:57 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53A071AE.80709@citrix.com \
--to=malcolm.crossley@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Paul.Durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).