From: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Shutdown panic in disable_nonboot_cpus after cpupool-numa-split
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 14:38:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BA94D0.80201@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53BA8BD1.4020506@citrix.com>
On 07/07/2014 02:00 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 07/07/14 12:33, Stefan Bader wrote:
>> I recently noticed that I get a panic (rebooting the system) on shutdown in some
> > cases. This happened only on my AMD system and also not all the time.
> Finally
> > realized that it is related to the use of using cpupool-numa-split
> > (libxl with xen-4.4 maybe, but not 100% sure 4.3 as well).
> >
> > What happens is that on shutdown the hypervisor runs
> disable_nonboot_cpus which
> > call cpu_down for each online cpu. There is a BUG_ON in the code for
> the case of
> > cpu_down returning -EBUSY. This happens in my case as soon as the
> first cpu that
> > has been moved to pool-1 by cpupool-numa-split is attempted. The error is
> > returned by running the notifier_call_chain and I suspect that ends
> up calling
> > cpupool_cpu_remove which always returns EBUSY for cpus not in pool0.
> >
> > I am not sure which end needs to be fixed but looping over all online
> cpus in
> > disable_nonboot_cpus sounds plausible. So maybe the check for pool-0 in
> > cpupool_cpu_remove is wrong...?
> >
> > -Stefan
>
> Hmm yes - this looks completely broken.
>
> cpupool_cpu_remove() only has a single caller which is from cpu_down(),
> and will unconditionally fail for cpus outside of the default pool.
>
> It is not obvious at all how this is supposed to work, and the comment
> beside cpupool_cpu_remove() doesn't help.
>
> Can you try the following (only compile tested) patch, which looks
> plausibly like it might DTRT. The for_each_cpupool() is a little nastly
> but there appears to be no cpu_to_cpupool mapping available.
Your patch has the disadvantage to support hot-unplug of the last cpu in
a cpupool. The following should work, however:
diff --git a/xen/common/cpupool.c b/xen/common/cpupool.c
index 4a0e569..73249d3 100644
--- a/xen/common/cpupool.c
+++ b/xen/common/cpupool.c
@@ -471,12 +471,24 @@ static void cpupool_cpu_add(unsigned int cpu)
*/
static int cpupool_cpu_remove(unsigned int cpu)
{
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret = -EBUSY;
+ struct cpupool **c;
spin_lock(&cpupool_lock);
- if ( !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpupool0->cpu_valid))
- ret = -EBUSY;
+ if ( cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpupool0->cpu_valid) )
+ ret = 0;
else
+ {
+ for_each_cpupool(c)
+ {
+ if ( cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, (*c)->cpu_suspended ) )
+ {
+ ret = 0;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ if ( !ret )
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpupool_locked_cpus);
spin_unlock(&cpupool_lock);
Juergen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-07 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-07 11:33 Shutdown panic in disable_nonboot_cpus after cpupool-numa-split Stefan Bader
2014-07-07 12:00 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-07-07 12:38 ` Jürgen Groß [this message]
2014-07-07 12:49 ` Stefan Bader
2014-07-07 13:03 ` Jürgen Groß
2014-07-07 14:08 ` Stefan Bader
2014-07-07 14:28 ` Juergen Gross
2014-07-07 14:43 ` Stefan Bader
2014-07-28 8:36 ` Stefan Bader
2014-07-28 8:50 ` Jürgen Groß
2014-07-28 9:02 ` Stefan Bader
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53BA94D0.80201@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).