From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/10] xen/arm: physical irq follow virtual irq Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:07:25 +0100 Message-ID: <53BFE18D.80000@linaro.org> References: <1405016003-19131-5-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1405016003-19131-5-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Stefano Stabellini , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Cc: julien.grall@citrix.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 07/10/2014 07:13 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > void vgic_disable_irqs(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t r, int n) > { > const unsigned long mask = r; > @@ -277,6 +297,7 @@ void vgic_enable_irqs(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t r, int n) > } > if ( p->desc != NULL ) > { > + irq_set_affinity(p->desc, cpumask_of(v_target->processor)); > spin_lock_irqsave(&p->desc->lock, flags); > p->desc->handler->enable(p->desc); > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->desc->lock, flags); > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h > index 6410280..8d93ccd 100644 > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h > @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ struct gic_hw_operations { > void register_gic_ops(const struct gic_hw_operations *ops); > > struct vcpu *vgic_get_target_vcpu(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int irq); > +void arch_move_irqs(struct vcpu *v); I would stay consistent with x86 by moving this declaration in irq.h. -- Julien Grall