From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/10] xen/arm: remove workaround to inject evtchn_irq on irq enable Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:10:26 +0100 Message-ID: <53BFE242.1090706@linaro.org> References: <1405016003-19131-7-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1405016003-19131-7-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Stefano Stabellini , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Cc: julien.grall@citrix.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Stefano, On 07/10/2014 07:13 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > index 69188a4..ed43a4c 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ > #include > > #include > +#include > #include > #include "kernel.h" > > @@ -1378,6 +1379,8 @@ int construct_dom0(struct domain *d) > } > #endif > > + vgic_vcpu_inject_irq(v, v->domain->arch.evtchn_irq); > IHMO, it misses a comment here to explain why we inject an IRQ for the event channel. Regards, -- Julien Grall