From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] xen: arm: update multiboot device tree bindings. Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:53:00 +0100 Message-ID: <53CCFF1C.10607@linaro.org> References: <1405688876.491.10.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <1405688900-11769-9-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <53C98BB4.5070302@linaro.org> <1405943128.25022.37.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1405943128.25022.37.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 07/21/2014 12:45 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 22:03 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hi Ian, >> >> On 18/07/14 14:08, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell >> >> Acked-by: Julien Grall > > Thanks. I've applied patches 1..9 of this series. I'll resend 10 ASAP > with the change you've suggested. > > On my potential backports list I've got: > xen: arm: implement generic multiboot compatibility strings > xen: arm: /chosen/module@N/bootargs bootprotcol node is not deprecated > > I don't think anything else here is suitable for backport. Let me know > if you think something is (or isn't) I would also update the document bindings in docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt. The patch #9 looks the good one for this purpose. Minus the unspecified type example. BTW, I don't find anything in the documentation talking about bootmodule type detection by ordering. Is this intended? Regards, -- Julien Grall