From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: Vijay Kilari <vijay.kilari@gmail.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Prasun Kapoor <Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com>,
Vijaya Kumar K <vijaya.kumar@caviumnetworks.com>,
Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>,
manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/5] xen/arm: Add support for GIC v3
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:15:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53CE47C2.3000801@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALicx6uNCOu67khRGVLtCRBPBQrH1F_Q1YjSm+_FfWzq7G+uoA@mail.gmail.com>
On 22/07/14 12:12, Vijay Kilari wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 16:19 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> + * Additional registers defined in GIC v3.
>>>>>>> + * Common GICD registers are defined in gic.h
>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +#define GICD_STATUSR (0x010)
>>>>>>> [...][
>>>>>>> +#define GICV3_GICD_PIDR0 (0x92)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is the distinction between variables with GIC[DR]_ prefixes and
>>>>>> those with GICV3_GIC[DR]_ ones?
>>>>>
>>>>> GICV3 is prefixed for indicating that there are values not the addresses.
>>>>> In anycase I will remove GICV3 prefixes and postfix _VAL
>>>>
>>>> You mean the value used when emulating a read, I think?
>>>
>>> Yes, it is used in gicv3 driver for checking presence of re-distributor
>>
>> In the phsyical h/w? That sounds wrong. 0x92 is just one possible value
>> of this register (and the spec says it should be 0x94...). I don't see
>> you using this #define in that way anywhere though so perhaps I've
>> misunderstood.
>
> I am using 20.0 version. which specifies 0x92 for ARM implementations of GICv3.
> May be other vendors can use different value. So it is better propagate hw value
> for emulation
>
> GICD_PIDR0:
> Bits [7:0]. Bits [7:0] of the ARM-defined DevID field. This field is 0x92 in
> ARM implementations of a GICv3 or later Distributor.
>
> In any case, GICD_PIDR0 is not used by gicv3 driver. GICD_PIDR2 & GICR_PIDR2 are
> used where check is made on ARCH_REV [7:4]
>
>>
>>> and also in vgicv3 for emulating read.
>>
>> I wonder if we should instead propagate the underlying hardware value?
>
> Yes,we can propagate hardware value.
I don't think we should propagate the hardware value. We may emulate a
different distributor than the hardware one. In this case,
implementation defined register won't work as expected by the kernel.
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-22 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-11 12:51 [PATCH v7 0/5] xen/arm: Add GICv3 support vijay.kilari
2014-07-11 12:51 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] xen/arm: Add support for GIC v3 vijay.kilari
2014-07-16 11:41 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-22 9:48 ` Vijay Kilari
2014-07-22 10:01 ` Julien Grall
2014-07-22 10:43 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-22 11:13 ` Julien Grall
2014-07-22 11:30 ` Vijay Kilari
2014-07-22 11:45 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-22 10:39 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-22 10:49 ` Vijay Kilari
2014-07-22 10:55 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-22 11:12 ` Vijay Kilari
2014-07-22 11:15 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2014-07-22 11:19 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-11 12:51 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] xen/arm: Add virtual GICv3 support vijay.kilari
2014-07-14 15:59 ` Julien Grall
2014-07-16 11:47 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-16 11:56 ` Vijay Kilari
2014-07-11 12:51 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] xen/arm: Update Dom0 GIC dt node with GICv3 information vijay.kilari
2014-07-16 11:53 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-11 12:51 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] xen/arm: add SGI handling for GICv3 vijay.kilari
2014-07-11 13:43 ` Julien Grall
2014-07-11 14:08 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-11 14:12 ` Julien Grall
2014-07-11 14:18 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-22 13:48 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-07-22 14:13 ` Vijay Kilari
2014-07-23 5:48 ` Vijay Kilari
2014-07-23 10:35 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-07-11 12:51 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] xen/arm: check for GICv3 platform support vijay.kilari
2014-07-16 12:11 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-16 10:35 ` [PATCH v7 0/5] xen/arm: Add GICv3 support Ian Campbell
2014-07-16 11:47 ` Vijay Kilari
2014-07-16 12:38 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-16 13:32 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-23 10:51 ` Vijay Kilari
2014-07-23 11:31 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53CE47C2.3000801@linaro.org \
--to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=vijay.kilari@gmail.com \
--cc=vijaya.kumar@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).