From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxc: expand cpuid features exposed to PVH guests Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:19:28 +0100 Message-ID: <53D65BF0.9050702@citrix.com> References: <1406124757-3925-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XBlm1-0007G5-8W for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:19:33 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1406124757-3925-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Roger Pau Monne , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Andrew Cooper , Ian Jackson , Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 23/07/14 15:12, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > Expand the cpuid features exposed to PVH guests, this includes > exposing PSE, PGE and 1GB pages (which will be masked by the > hypervisor if not supported by the hardware). I'm confused. Why is PVH using the PV CPUID policy instead of the HVM one? David