From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/10] xen/arm: support irq delivery to vcpu > 0 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 17:16:38 +0100 Message-ID: <53D67766.4000600@linaro.org> References: <1406223192-26267-4-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1406223192-26267-4-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Stefano Stabellini , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Cc: julien.grall@citrix.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Stefano, On 07/24/2014 06:33 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c > index 5f45cd2..02e5985 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c > @@ -400,6 +400,17 @@ out: > smp_send_event_check_mask(cpumask_of(v->processor)); > } > > +void vgic_vcpu_inject_spi(struct domain *d, unsigned int irq) I know I've already acked this patch... I was looking to the code, and I found the name of this function odd. Actually we are injecting the spis to the domain d, not a specific VCPU. The correct name would be vgic_domain_inject_spi. Anyway, I'm perfectly fine to send a follow-up later. Regards, -- Julien Grall