From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/7] xen/arm: Add virtual GICv3 support Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 17:30:43 +0100 Message-ID: <53D67AB3.6080709@linaro.org> References: <1406122913-8303-1-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <1406122913-8303-5-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <1406558121.15471.1.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <1406559353.16498.3.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <53D66DD2.7070907@linaro.org> <1406563342.17854.13.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <53D6762B.6050407@linaro.org> <1406564752.15040.7.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1406564752.15040.7.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Vijay Kilari , Stefano Stabellini , Prasun Kapoor , Vijaya Kumar K , Tim Deegan , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Stefano Stabellini , Jan Beulich , manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 07/28/2014 05:25 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2014-07-28 at 17:11 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > >> It might be worse to add a check in Xen that ICC_SRE_EL3 as the SRE bit >> enabled. > > I don't think it is readable from EL2. Oh yes. FWIW, the Linux documentation say: "For systems with a GICv3 interrupt controller: - If EL3 is present: ICC_SRE_EL3.Enable (bit 3) must be initialiased to 0b1. ICC_SRE_EL3.SRE (bit 0) must be initialised to 0b1. - If the kernel is entered at EL1: ICC.SRE_EL2.Enable (bit 3) must be initialised to 0b1 ICC_SRE_EL2.SRE (bit 0) must be initialised to 0b1. " I guess if the firmware doesn't set up correctly those values, then it's the problem of the firmware developper. Regards, -- Julien Grall