xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] evtchn: make EVTCHNOP_reset suitable for kexec
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:42:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D8F635.3070601@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406726810-2557-2-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com>

On 30/07/14 14:26, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> It would be nice to allow guests to close all event channels in
> ABI-agnostic way in case of kexec/kdump. EVTCHNOP_reset looks suitable
> for this purpose. However control blocks for vcpus and event array need
> cleanup when FIFO ABI is being used.
> 
> With this change a guest can simply do EVTCHNOP_reset before kexec in
> both 2-level and FIFO cases. It is also important to perform store/console
> channel remapping after such call.

Can you add documentation to xen/include/public/event_channels.h?

> The issue can also be solved by introducing a new EVTCHNOP operation but
> it seems that EVTCHNOP_reset can be reused.
> 
> [The idea was suggested by Ian Campbell, Andrew Cooper, and David Vrabel]
> 
> Changes from v1:

List changes after a --- marker so they don't end up in the final commit
message.

> --- a/xen/common/event_channel.c
> +++ b/xen/common/event_channel.c
> @@ -957,6 +957,17 @@ static long evtchn_reset(evtchn_reset_t *r)
>      for ( i = 0; port_is_valid(d, i); i++ )
>          (void)__evtchn_close(d, i);
>  
> +    if ( (d == current->domain) && d->evtchn_fifo )
> +    {
> +        /*
> +         * Guest domain called EVTCHNOP_reset with DOMID_SELF, destroying
> +         * FIFO event array and control blocks, resetting evtchn_port_ops to
> +         * evtchn_port_ops_2l.
> +         */
> +        evtchn_fifo_destroy(d);
> +        evtchn_2l_init(d);

You need to take d->event_lock around this if, or the guest could try to
bind another event whilst the ABI is in an inconsistent state.

David

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-30 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-30 13:26 [PATCH v2 0/1] evtchn: make EVTCHNOP_reset suitable for kexec Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-07-30 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-07-30 13:41   ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-30 13:59     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-07-30 14:05       ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-30 13:42   ` David Vrabel [this message]
2014-07-30 13:53     ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-30 14:03       ` David Vrabel
2014-07-30 14:14         ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53D8F635.3070601@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).