From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] xen:include:asm-x86:e820: just covert
 nr_map with unsigned int
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 15:26:18 +0800
Message-ID: <53E47B9A.60905@intel.com>
References: <1407481204-28290-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
	<53E4952B020000780002A5EF@mail.emea.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <53E4952B020000780002A5EF@mail.emea.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: keir@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 2014/8/8 15:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 08.08.14 at 09:00, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>> This shouldn't ever be negative.
>
> This means nothing for the actual change, and makes me imply you did
> the change without checking it actually _is_ never negative in any of
> the uses.
>
> Also please cut down your patch title prefixes (not just here) to
> something reasonable.
>

What about this?

xen:e820map: just convert nr_map with unsigned int

nr_map is used to represent the amount of e820entry in e820 so it
shouldn't be negative.

Thanks
Tiejun