xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, keir@xen.org,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
	tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, jun.nakajima@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/20] x86/VPMU: Manage VPMU_CONTEXT_SAVE flag in vpmu_save_force()
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:35:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E8E2D3.6050008@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53E8E102020000780002B2E9@mail.emea.novell.com>

On 08/11/2014 09:28 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 08.08.14 at 18:55, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
>> vpmu_load() may leave VPMU_CONTEXT_SAVE set after calling vpmu_save_force() if
>> the context is not loaded.
> To me this is ambiguous (and looking at the patch I can't really
> resolve it): Do you mean to say this can validly happen, or that it
> could have happened in error prior to the patch? In any event
> please alter the description to either clearly state what the wrong
> old behavior was, or what the correct new behavior is to be.

What I was trying to say (not particularly successfully, apparently) is 
that currently (i.e. prior to the patch) we may end up not clearing 
VPMU_CONTEXT_SAVE flag after calling vpmu_save_forced(). And that would 
be a bug, which this patch is fixing.

(It doesn't help that the diff doesn't show that the flag is cleared 
right after ->arch_vpmu_save() below)

-boris

>
> Jan
>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>   xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c
>> index 63765fa..26e971b 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c
>> @@ -130,6 +130,8 @@ static void vpmu_save_force(void *arg)
>>       if ( !vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED) )
>>           return;
>>   
>> +    vpmu_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_SAVE);
>> +
>>       if ( vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops )
>>           (void)vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->arch_vpmu_save(v);
>>   
>> @@ -178,7 +180,6 @@ void vpmu_load(struct vcpu *v)
>>            */
>>           if ( vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED) )
>>           {
>> -            vpmu_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_SAVE);
>>               on_selected_cpus(cpumask_of(vpmu->last_pcpu),
>>                                vpmu_save_force, (void *)v, 1);
>>               vpmu_reset(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED);
>> @@ -195,7 +196,6 @@ void vpmu_load(struct vcpu *v)
>>           vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(prev);
>>   
>>           /* Someone ran here before us */
>> -        vpmu_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_SAVE);
>>           vpmu_save_force(prev);
>>           vpmu_reset(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED);
>>   
>> -- 
>> 1.8.1.4
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-11 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-08 16:55 [PATCH v9 00/20] x86/PMU: Xen PMU PV(H) support Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 01/20] common/symbols: Export hypervisor symbols to privileged guest Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 02/20] x86/VPMU: Manage VPMU_CONTEXT_SAVE flag in vpmu_save_force() Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-11 13:28   ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 15:35     ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 03/20] x86/VPMU: Set MSR bitmaps only for HVM/PVH guests Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 04/20] x86/VPMU: Make vpmu macros a bit more efficient Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 05/20] intel/VPMU: Clean up Intel VPMU code Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-11 13:45   ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 16:01     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-11 16:13       ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 06/20] vmx: Merge MSR management routines Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 07/20] x86/VPMU: Handle APIC_LVTPC accesses Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-11 13:49   ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 08/20] intel/VPMU: MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL should be initialized to zero Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 09/20] x86/VPMU: Add public xenpmu.h Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-11 14:08   ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 16:15     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-18 16:02       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-18 20:23         ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 10/20] x86/VPMU: Make vpmu not HVM-specific Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 11/20] x86/VPMU: Interface for setting PMU mode and flags Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-12 10:37   ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-12 15:12     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-12 15:35       ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-12 16:25         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-14 16:32           ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 12/20] x86/VPMU: Initialize PMU for PV(H) guests Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-12 11:59   ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 13/20] x86/VPMU: When handling MSR accesses, leave fault injection to callers Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-12 12:45   ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-12 15:47     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-12 16:00       ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-12 16:30         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 14/20] x86/VPMU: Add support for PMU register handling on PV guests Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-12 12:55   ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 15/20] x86/VPMU: Handle PMU interrupts for " Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-12 12:58   ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 16/20] x86/VPMU: Merge vpmu_rdmsr and vpmu_wrmsr Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 17/20] x86/VPMU: Add privileged PMU mode Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-12 13:06   ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-12 16:14     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 18/20] x86/VPMU: Save VPMU state for PV guests during context switch Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-12 14:15   ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 19/20] x86/VPMU: NMI-based VPMU support Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-12 14:24   ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v9 20/20] x86/VPMU: Move VPMU files up from hvm/ directory Boris Ostrovsky
2014-08-12 14:26   ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 13:32 ` [PATCH v9 00/20] x86/PMU: Xen PMU PV(H) support Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53E8E2D3.6050008@oracle.com \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).