xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org>,
	stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com,
	stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: Fix smp_send_call_function_mask() for current CPU
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 22:52:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53ED2F9D.1050904@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53ECAF3A.1080406@linaro.org>

On 14/08/14 13:44, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 08/14/2014 12:47 PM, Anup Patel wrote:
>> The smp_send_call_function_mask() does not work on Foundation v8
>> model with one CPU. The reason being gicv2_send_SGI() is called
>> with irqmode==SGI_TARGET_LIST and *cpu_mask=0x1 on CPU0 which
>> does not work on Foundation v8 model.
>
> Please provide any steps, trace that make you think that irqmode ==
> SGI_TARGET_LIST and *cpu_mask=0x1 is not working on Foundation V8 Model.
>
>> Further, it is really strange that smp_send_call_function_mask()
>> depends on GIC SGIs for calling function on current CPU.
>
> Why it's strange??? The GIC specification doesn't seem to add any
> restriction about sending an SGI to the current CPU.
>
> It clearly looks like a bug in another part of Xen. And I doubt it's
> because the Foundation Model is not able to support the use case above.
>
> Without any further explanation than "It doesn't work" and "It's
> strange", I don't think this patch should be accepted in Xen.
> You need at least to point the paragraph in the spec...
>
>> This patch fixes smp_send_call_function_mask() for current CPU
>> by directly calling smp_call_function_interrupt() on current CPU.
>> This is very similar to what Xen x86 does.
>
> What was done in x86 may not make sense on ARM....
>
> For me the current code is valid... So far, I didn't see any issue on
> different boards. I've also used recently the Foundation v8 Model [1],
> without any issue.

I just saw their is new version of the model. I've tested sucessfully 
xen on:

ARM V8 Foundation Model r0p0 (model build 0.8.5206)

I will give a try on newer version.

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-14 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-14 11:47 [PATCH] xen/arm: Fix smp_send_call_function_mask() for current CPU Anup Patel
2014-08-14 11:49 ` Anup Patel
2014-08-14 12:44 ` Julien Grall
2014-08-14 21:52   ` Julien Grall [this message]
2014-08-15  3:58   ` Anup Patel
2014-08-15  9:28 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-08-15 10:12   ` Anup Patel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53ED2F9D.1050904@linaro.org \
    --to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=anup.patel@linaro.org \
    --cc=pranavkumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).