From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>, Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: xen 4.3 -> 4.4.0 API change / spurious file handle closure
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:46:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53F1F5B2.8050604@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B118F1AD-584C-4F1B-B862-F17EB107402E@alex.org.uk>
On 18/08/14 13:28, Alex Bligh wrote:
> I have an application which works when compiled against
> Xen 4.3 but when compiled against Xen 4.4.0 causes a
> spurious file handle closure. Specifically fd 0 is
> closed when it has nothing to do with Xen. This
> happens with a simple call to libxl_ctx_alloc /
> libxl_ctx_free.
>
> This can be seen from the snippet below which
> simply lists the open fds. In the 'before' call,
> the 'ls' command (run from system) opens fd 3
> for the directory. In the 'after' call, the
> alloc/free has closed fd 0, so fd 0 is reused
> for the 'ls' command.
>
> This worked fine under Xen 4.3.
>
> The addition of
> #define LIBXL_API_VERSION 0x040200
> does not appear to affect things.
>
> Any idea what's up here?
>
Thats antisocial. I have reproduced the issue.
Stracing it (with some extra debugging)...
write(1, "Freeing libxl ctx", 17Freeing libxl ctx) = 17
write(1, "\n", 1
) = 1
close(5) = 0
close(6) = 0
close(7) = 0
close(3) = 0
close(4) = 0
close(0) = 0
write(1, "Finished freeing", 16Finished freeing) = 16
Shows that libxl_ctx_free() is closing fd 0.
I suspect it has an fd which is 0 rather than -1. I will take a look.
~Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-18 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-18 12:28 xen 4.3 -> 4.4.0 API change / spurious file handle closure Alex Bligh
2014-08-18 12:46 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53F1F5B2.8050604@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=alex@alex.org.uk \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).