From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/9] vnuma hook to debug-keys u Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 16:46:22 +0100 Message-ID: <53FCC7EE020000780002DBE6@mail.emea.novell.com> References: <1409039106-955-1-git-send-email-ufimtseva@gmail.com> <53FCC40B020000780002DB89@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Elena Ufimtseva Cc: Keir Fraser , Ian Campbell , Li Yechen , George Dunlap , Matt Wilson , Dario Faggioli , Stefano Stabellini , Ian Jackson , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 26.08.14 at 17:36, wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Actually I'm afraid Konrad's comment (and me agreeing to it) >> misguided you here: The function is currently written in Linux >> style, so Linux style is what the changes should be in. I.e. >> opening curly braces on the same line as the end of their >> control construct, and no blanks inside outermost parentheses >> of control constructs. >> >> However, the comment regarding overly long lines was correct >> (and sadly still stands), and there are indentation issues too. > > This file has both coding styles and every my attempt to match it fails :) Not really, its Linux style with perhaps a few mistakes. > Can I make changes to numa.c so it will be formatted like any other > file if there > is no reason to have it formatted in this way? If you feel up to making it have entirely uniform style, just go for it. Jan