xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Don Slutz <dslutz@verizon.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>,
	Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	Don Slutz <dslutz@verizon.com>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/nmi: Make external NMI injection reliably crash the host
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:51:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FD0156.1010708@terremark.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53FCBB10.6050108@citrix.com>

On 08/26/14 12:51, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 26/08/14 17:06, Don Slutz wrote:
>> On 08/26/14 06:10, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
>>> Change the watchdog handler to only "tick" if the corresponding perf
>>> counter has overflowed; otherwise, return false from the NMI handler to
>>> indicate that the NMI is not a watchdog tick and let the other handlers
>>> handle it.  This allows externally injected NMIs to reliably crash the
>>> host rather than be swallowed by the watchdog handler.
>> If a crash kernel has been setup via kexec, does this change to
>> "crash host" ends up jumping into the crash kernel?
>>
>>      -Don Slutz
> No - this has no change of behaviour as to how Xen proceeds after it has
> decided to panic().
>
> It does however change whether Xen decided to panic, depending on
> whether the NMI was a result of the watchdog, or some otherwise
> unidentified NMI.
>
> Basically, without this change, the "inject fatal NMI" option in most
> IPMI controllers doesn't work in combination with running the Xen
> watchdog.  Only certain HP systems appear to set the IOCK bit in the
> system control port B when injecting an NMI.  All other systems just
> send an NMI with no change to the control ports, which get eaten by the
> watchdog logic.
>
> This patch changes the watchdog logic to only consider an NMI as a
> watchdog tick if the perf counter confirms that it injected the NMI.

Well, that is useful information.  Looks like I was not clear.  I am reading

> as to how Xen proceeds after it has

 > decided to panic().


As a yes, but you start with a no.  And I am getting "crash host" to 
mean "calls panic()".

    -Don Slutz

> ~Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-26 21:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-26 10:10 [PATCH] x86/nmi: Make external NMI injection reliably crash the host Ross Lagerwall
2014-08-26 10:17 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-08-26 12:59 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-26 15:26   ` Ross Lagerwall
2014-08-26 15:38     ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-27 11:14       ` Ross Lagerwall
2014-08-27 12:04         ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-26 16:06 ` Don Slutz
2014-08-26 16:51   ` Andrew Cooper
2014-08-26 21:51     ` Don Slutz [this message]
2014-08-26 23:01       ` Andrew Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53FD0156.1010708@terremark.com \
    --to=dslutz@verizon.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=ross.lagerwall@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).