From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] xen: arm: introduce uImage probe function for Dom0 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 16:51:13 -0400 Message-ID: <5400E7C1.3070407@linaro.org> References: <1409223261-15656-1-git-send-email-oleksandr.dmytryshyn@globallogic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1409223261-15656-1-git-send-email-oleksandr.dmytryshyn@globallogic.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Oleksandr Dmytryshyn , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , Tim Deegan , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Oleksandr, On 28/08/14 06:54, Oleksandr Dmytryshyn wrote: > #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64 > /* > * Check if the image is a 64-bit Image. > @@ -398,6 +467,8 @@ int kernel_probe(struct kernel_info *info) > rc = kernel_zimage64_probe(info, start, size); > if (rc < 0) > #endif > + rc = kernel_uimage_probe(info, start, size); > + if(rc < 0 ) NIT: the coding style is: if ( rc < 0 ) It looks like the other if in this function don't respect the coding style. I wouldn't resend a new version of this patch this small NIT. Maybe Ian can fix it when it will be applied? Anyway: Reviewed-by: Julien Grall Regards, -- Julien Grall