xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com,
	stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
	yang.z.zhang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [v5][PATCH 03/10] xen:x86: define a new hypercall to get RMRR mappings
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 17:59:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <540594F2.4000406@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540466A8020000780002F656@mail.emea.novell.com>

On 2014/9/1 18:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 01.09.14 at 11:44, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 2014/8/29 17:18, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>
>>> This still allocates another instance of structures to create a second
>>> linked list. Did you consider get_device_reserved_memory() to take
>>
>> Do you mean we still use this existing type combo, acpi_rmrr_units and
>> acpi_rmrr_units?
>>
>>> a callback function instead?
>>>
>>
>> But we should do something like this,
>>
>> 1. .get_device_reserved_memory = get_drm_all,
>> 2.  static int get_drm_all(struct list_head *dev_reserved_memory)
>>       {
>>           return (get_drm_callback(dev_reserved_memory));
>>       }
>>
>> 3. get_drm_callback = get_device_acpi_reserved_memory;
>> 4.  static int get_device_acpi_reserved_memory(struct list_head
>> *dev_reserved_memory)
>>       {
>> 	...
>> 	dev_reserved_memory = &acpi_rmrr_units;
>> 	...
>>       }
>>
>> Then while calling the hypercall,
>>
>> struct list_head *dev_reserved_memory = NULL;
>> nr_entries = ops->get_device_reserved_memory(dev_reserved_memory);
>> if (!nr_entries)
>> 	list_for_each_entry( darm, dev_reserved_memory, list )
>> 	{
>> 		xxx.start_pfn = ...;
>> 		xxx.nr_pages = ...;
>> 		if ( copy_to_guest_offset(buffer, i, &xxx, 1) )
>> 		...
>> 	}
>
> Clearly not: The callback ought to be used _while_ processing the
> hypercall. And of course the callback shouldn't be used to retrieve
> &acpi_rmrr_units, but to report back to the calling entity the
> individual regions.
>

Jan,

I see you're reviewing other patches in v5 so really appreciate your 
comments.

But I will address those comments until here I can implement this 
callback mechanism as you expect. Because some comments from other 
patches may need to rebase on this better way. So I hope I can finish 
your callback mechanism firstly to avoid bring you potential duplicated 
faults :)

So could you take a look at the follows?

xen/vtd: add one iommu ops to expose device reserved
  memory

We need this interface to expose device reserved memory
safely in common place.

Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
---
  xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c  | 40 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c | 14 +++++++++++++
  xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h         |  3 +++
  xen/include/xen/iommu.h             |  1 +
  4 files changed, 58 insertions(+)

diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c 
b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
index 1152c3a..f46aee2 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
@@ -567,6 +567,44 @@ out:
      return ret;
  }

+extern get_device_reserved_memory_t get_drm_callback;
+struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory 
*get_device_acpi_reserved_memory(unsigned int *nr_entries)
+{
+    struct acpi_rmrr_unit *rmrru;
+    static struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory *rmrrm = NULL;
+    static unsigned int drm_entries = 0;
+    static unsigned int check_done = 0;
+    unsigned int i = 0;
+
+    *nr_entries = drm_entries;
+    if ( check_done )
+        return rmrrm;
+
+    list_for_each_entry(rmrru, &acpi_rmrr_units, list)
+        drm_entries++;
+
+    if ( drm_entries )
+    {
+        rmrrm = xzalloc_array(struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory,
+                              drm_entries);
+        if ( !rmrrm )
+            return NULL;
+
+        list_for_each_entry(rmrru, &acpi_rmrr_units, list)
+        {
+            rmrrm[i].start_pfn = rmrru->base_address >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+            rmrrm[i].nr_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(rmrru->end_address -
+                                           rmrru->base_address) /
+                                           PAGE_SIZE;
+            i++;
+        }
+    }
+
+    check_done = 1;
+
+    return rmrrm;
+}
+
  static int __init
  acpi_parse_one_rmrr(struct acpi_dmar_header *header)
  {
@@ -678,6 +716,8 @@ acpi_parse_one_rmrr(struct acpi_dmar_header *header)
          }
      }

+    get_drm_callback = get_device_acpi_reserved_memory;
+
      return ret;
  }

diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c 
b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
index 042b882..43ff443 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
@@ -2461,6 +2461,19 @@ static void vtd_dump_p2m_table(struct domain *d)
      vtd_dump_p2m_table_level(hd->arch.pgd_maddr, 
agaw_to_level(hd->arch.agaw), 0, 0);
  }

+struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory *dummy_get_drm_callback(unsigned 
int *nr_entries)
+{
+    *nr_entries = 0;
+    return NULL;
+}
+
+get_device_reserved_memory_t get_drm_callback = dummy_get_drm_callback;
+
+struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory *get_drm_all(unsigned int 
*nr_entries)
+{
+    return (get_drm_callback(nr_entries));
+}
+
  const struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops = {
      .init = intel_iommu_domain_init,
      .hwdom_init = intel_iommu_hwdom_init,
@@ -2486,6 +2499,7 @@ const struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops = {
      .iotlb_flush = intel_iommu_iotlb_flush,
      .iotlb_flush_all = intel_iommu_iotlb_flush_all,
      .dump_p2m_table = vtd_dump_p2m_table,
+    .get_device_reserved_memory = get_drm_all,
  };

  /*
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h
index e7a65da..aead1d7 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
  #ifndef __ARCH_X86_IOMMU_H__
  #define __ARCH_X86_IOMMU_H__

+#include <public/memory.h>
+
  #define MAX_IOMMUS 32

  /* Does this domain have a P2M table we can use as its IOMMU pagetable? */
@@ -32,6 +34,7 @@ int iommu_supports_eim(void);
  int iommu_enable_x2apic_IR(void);
  void iommu_disable_x2apic_IR(void);

+typedef struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory* 
(*get_device_reserved_memory_t)(unsigned int *nr_entries);
  #endif /* !__ARCH_X86_IOMMU_H__ */
  /*
   * Local variables:
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/iommu.h b/xen/include/xen/iommu.h
index 8eb764a..8806ef6 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/iommu.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/iommu.h
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ struct iommu_ops {
      void (*update_ire_from_apic)(unsigned int apic, unsigned int reg, 
unsigned int value);
      unsigned int (*read_apic_from_ire)(unsigned int apic, unsigned int 
reg);
      int (*setup_hpet_msi)(struct msi_desc *);
+    struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory* 
(*get_device_reserved_memory)(unsigned int *nr_entries);
  #endif /* CONFIG_X86 */
      void (*suspend)(void);
      void (*resume)(void);
-- 


Then when call the hypercall,

+    case XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map:
+    {
+        struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory *xmrdm = NULL;
+        struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map xmrdmm;
+        XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t) buffer;
+        XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t) 
buffer_param;
+        const struct iommu_ops *ops = iommu_get_ops();
+        unsigned int nr_entries = 0;
+        unsigned int i = 0;
+
+        xmrdm = ops->get_device_reserved_memory(&nr_entries);
+        if ( !nr_entries )
+            return -ENOENT;
+        if ( nr_entries < 0 )
+            return -EFAULT;
+
+        if ( copy_from_guest(&xmrdmm, arg, 1) )
+            return -EFAULT;
+
+        if ( xmrdmm.nr_entries < nr_entries )
+        {
+            xmrdmm.nr_entries = nr_entries;
+            if ( copy_to_guest(arg, &xmrdmm, 1) )
+                return -EFAULT;
+            return -ENOBUFS;
+        }
+
+        buffer_param = guest_handle_cast(xmrdmm.buffer,
+                                         xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t);
+        buffer = guest_handle_from_param(buffer_param,
+                                         xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t);
+        if ( !guest_handle_okay(buffer, xmrdmm.nr_entries) )
+            return -EFAULT;
+
+        for ( i = 0; i < nr_entries; i++ )
+        {
+            if ( copy_to_guest_offset(buffer, i, xmrdm + i, 1) )
+                return -EFAULT;
+        }
+
+        xmrdmm.nr_entries = i;
+
+        if ( copy_to_guest(arg, &xmrdmm, 1) )
+                return -EFAULT;
+
+        return 0;
+    }
+



Thanks
Tiejun

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-02  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-26 11:02 [v5][PATCH 0/10] xen: reserve RMRR to avoid conflicting MMIO/RAM Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 01/10] xen:vtd:rmrr: export acpi_rmrr_units Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 02/10] xen:vtd:rmrr: introduce acpi_rmrr_unit_entries Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 03/10] xen:x86: define a new hypercall to get RMRR mappings Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 12:02   ` Andrew Cooper
2014-08-26 12:37     ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-27  1:37       ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-27  6:51         ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-27  7:21           ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28  2:24             ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28  6:50               ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-28  7:09                 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28  7:19                   ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28  7:29                     ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28  7:44                     ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-29  3:02                       ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-29  9:18                         ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-01  9:44                           ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-01 10:29                             ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-02  9:59                               ` Chen, Tiejun [this message]
2014-09-02 10:15                                 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-02 11:10                                   ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-02 13:15                                     ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-03  1:45                                       ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03  8:31                                         ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03  8:41                                           ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-03  8:59                                             ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03  9:01                                               ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03  9:54                                                 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03 12:54                                             ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04  1:15                                               ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03  8:35                                         ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-27  1:15     ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-02  8:25   ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 04/10] tools:libxc: introduce hypercall for xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 05/10] tools:libxc: check if mmio BAR is out of RMRR mappings Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 06/10] hvm_info_table: introduce nr_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-09-02  8:34   ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04  2:07     ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-04  6:32       ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04  6:55         ` Chen, Tiejun
     [not found]           ` <54082E3B0200007800030BCB@mail.emea.novell.com>
2014-09-09  6:40             ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 07/10] xen:x86:: support xc_reserved_device_memory_map in compat case Tiejun Chen
2014-09-02  8:35   ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04  2:13     ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 08/10] tools:firmware:hvmloader: introduce hypercall for xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-09-02  8:37   ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 09/10] tools:firmware:hvmloader: check to reserve RMRR mappings in e820 Tiejun Chen
2014-09-02  8:47   ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04  3:04     ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-04  4:32       ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-04  6:36       ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-26 11:03 ` [v5][PATCH 10/10] xen:vtd: make USB RMRR mapping safe Tiejun Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=540594F2.4000406@intel.com \
    --to=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    --cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).