From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com,
stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
yang.z.zhang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [v5][PATCH 03/10] xen:x86: define a new hypercall to get RMRR mappings
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 17:59:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <540594F2.4000406@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540466A8020000780002F656@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 2014/9/1 18:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 01.09.14 at 11:44, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 2014/8/29 17:18, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>
>>> This still allocates another instance of structures to create a second
>>> linked list. Did you consider get_device_reserved_memory() to take
>>
>> Do you mean we still use this existing type combo, acpi_rmrr_units and
>> acpi_rmrr_units?
>>
>>> a callback function instead?
>>>
>>
>> But we should do something like this,
>>
>> 1. .get_device_reserved_memory = get_drm_all,
>> 2. static int get_drm_all(struct list_head *dev_reserved_memory)
>> {
>> return (get_drm_callback(dev_reserved_memory));
>> }
>>
>> 3. get_drm_callback = get_device_acpi_reserved_memory;
>> 4. static int get_device_acpi_reserved_memory(struct list_head
>> *dev_reserved_memory)
>> {
>> ...
>> dev_reserved_memory = &acpi_rmrr_units;
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> Then while calling the hypercall,
>>
>> struct list_head *dev_reserved_memory = NULL;
>> nr_entries = ops->get_device_reserved_memory(dev_reserved_memory);
>> if (!nr_entries)
>> list_for_each_entry( darm, dev_reserved_memory, list )
>> {
>> xxx.start_pfn = ...;
>> xxx.nr_pages = ...;
>> if ( copy_to_guest_offset(buffer, i, &xxx, 1) )
>> ...
>> }
>
> Clearly not: The callback ought to be used _while_ processing the
> hypercall. And of course the callback shouldn't be used to retrieve
> &acpi_rmrr_units, but to report back to the calling entity the
> individual regions.
>
Jan,
I see you're reviewing other patches in v5 so really appreciate your
comments.
But I will address those comments until here I can implement this
callback mechanism as you expect. Because some comments from other
patches may need to rebase on this better way. So I hope I can finish
your callback mechanism firstly to avoid bring you potential duplicated
faults :)
So could you take a look at the follows?
xen/vtd: add one iommu ops to expose device reserved
memory
We need this interface to expose device reserved memory
safely in common place.
Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
---
xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c | 40
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c | 14 +++++++++++++
xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h | 3 +++
xen/include/xen/iommu.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
index 1152c3a..f46aee2 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
@@ -567,6 +567,44 @@ out:
return ret;
}
+extern get_device_reserved_memory_t get_drm_callback;
+struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory
*get_device_acpi_reserved_memory(unsigned int *nr_entries)
+{
+ struct acpi_rmrr_unit *rmrru;
+ static struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory *rmrrm = NULL;
+ static unsigned int drm_entries = 0;
+ static unsigned int check_done = 0;
+ unsigned int i = 0;
+
+ *nr_entries = drm_entries;
+ if ( check_done )
+ return rmrrm;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(rmrru, &acpi_rmrr_units, list)
+ drm_entries++;
+
+ if ( drm_entries )
+ {
+ rmrrm = xzalloc_array(struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory,
+ drm_entries);
+ if ( !rmrrm )
+ return NULL;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(rmrru, &acpi_rmrr_units, list)
+ {
+ rmrrm[i].start_pfn = rmrru->base_address >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ rmrrm[i].nr_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(rmrru->end_address -
+ rmrru->base_address) /
+ PAGE_SIZE;
+ i++;
+ }
+ }
+
+ check_done = 1;
+
+ return rmrrm;
+}
+
static int __init
acpi_parse_one_rmrr(struct acpi_dmar_header *header)
{
@@ -678,6 +716,8 @@ acpi_parse_one_rmrr(struct acpi_dmar_header *header)
}
}
+ get_drm_callback = get_device_acpi_reserved_memory;
+
return ret;
}
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
index 042b882..43ff443 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
@@ -2461,6 +2461,19 @@ static void vtd_dump_p2m_table(struct domain *d)
vtd_dump_p2m_table_level(hd->arch.pgd_maddr,
agaw_to_level(hd->arch.agaw), 0, 0);
}
+struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory *dummy_get_drm_callback(unsigned
int *nr_entries)
+{
+ *nr_entries = 0;
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+get_device_reserved_memory_t get_drm_callback = dummy_get_drm_callback;
+
+struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory *get_drm_all(unsigned int
*nr_entries)
+{
+ return (get_drm_callback(nr_entries));
+}
+
const struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops = {
.init = intel_iommu_domain_init,
.hwdom_init = intel_iommu_hwdom_init,
@@ -2486,6 +2499,7 @@ const struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops = {
.iotlb_flush = intel_iommu_iotlb_flush,
.iotlb_flush_all = intel_iommu_iotlb_flush_all,
.dump_p2m_table = vtd_dump_p2m_table,
+ .get_device_reserved_memory = get_drm_all,
};
/*
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h
index e7a65da..aead1d7 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
#ifndef __ARCH_X86_IOMMU_H__
#define __ARCH_X86_IOMMU_H__
+#include <public/memory.h>
+
#define MAX_IOMMUS 32
/* Does this domain have a P2M table we can use as its IOMMU pagetable? */
@@ -32,6 +34,7 @@ int iommu_supports_eim(void);
int iommu_enable_x2apic_IR(void);
void iommu_disable_x2apic_IR(void);
+typedef struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory*
(*get_device_reserved_memory_t)(unsigned int *nr_entries);
#endif /* !__ARCH_X86_IOMMU_H__ */
/*
* Local variables:
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/iommu.h b/xen/include/xen/iommu.h
index 8eb764a..8806ef6 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/iommu.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/iommu.h
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ struct iommu_ops {
void (*update_ire_from_apic)(unsigned int apic, unsigned int reg,
unsigned int value);
unsigned int (*read_apic_from_ire)(unsigned int apic, unsigned int
reg);
int (*setup_hpet_msi)(struct msi_desc *);
+ struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory*
(*get_device_reserved_memory)(unsigned int *nr_entries);
#endif /* CONFIG_X86 */
void (*suspend)(void);
void (*resume)(void);
--
Then when call the hypercall,
+ case XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map:
+ {
+ struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory *xmrdm = NULL;
+ struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map xmrdmm;
+ XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t) buffer;
+ XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t)
buffer_param;
+ const struct iommu_ops *ops = iommu_get_ops();
+ unsigned int nr_entries = 0;
+ unsigned int i = 0;
+
+ xmrdm = ops->get_device_reserved_memory(&nr_entries);
+ if ( !nr_entries )
+ return -ENOENT;
+ if ( nr_entries < 0 )
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ if ( copy_from_guest(&xmrdmm, arg, 1) )
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ if ( xmrdmm.nr_entries < nr_entries )
+ {
+ xmrdmm.nr_entries = nr_entries;
+ if ( copy_to_guest(arg, &xmrdmm, 1) )
+ return -EFAULT;
+ return -ENOBUFS;
+ }
+
+ buffer_param = guest_handle_cast(xmrdmm.buffer,
+ xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t);
+ buffer = guest_handle_from_param(buffer_param,
+ xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t);
+ if ( !guest_handle_okay(buffer, xmrdmm.nr_entries) )
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ for ( i = 0; i < nr_entries; i++ )
+ {
+ if ( copy_to_guest_offset(buffer, i, xmrdm + i, 1) )
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+
+ xmrdmm.nr_entries = i;
+
+ if ( copy_to_guest(arg, &xmrdmm, 1) )
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ return 0;
+ }
+
Thanks
Tiejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-02 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-26 11:02 [v5][PATCH 0/10] xen: reserve RMRR to avoid conflicting MMIO/RAM Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 01/10] xen:vtd:rmrr: export acpi_rmrr_units Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 02/10] xen:vtd:rmrr: introduce acpi_rmrr_unit_entries Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 03/10] xen:x86: define a new hypercall to get RMRR mappings Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 12:02 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-08-26 12:37 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-27 1:37 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-27 6:51 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-27 7:21 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28 2:24 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28 6:50 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-28 7:09 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28 7:19 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28 7:29 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28 7:44 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-29 3:02 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-29 9:18 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-01 9:44 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-01 10:29 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-02 9:59 ` Chen, Tiejun [this message]
2014-09-02 10:15 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-02 11:10 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-02 13:15 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-03 1:45 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03 8:31 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03 8:41 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-03 8:59 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03 9:01 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03 9:54 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03 12:54 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 1:15 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03 8:35 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-27 1:15 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-02 8:25 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 04/10] tools:libxc: introduce hypercall for xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 05/10] tools:libxc: check if mmio BAR is out of RMRR mappings Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 06/10] hvm_info_table: introduce nr_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-09-02 8:34 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 2:07 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-04 6:32 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 6:55 ` Chen, Tiejun
[not found] ` <54082E3B0200007800030BCB@mail.emea.novell.com>
2014-09-09 6:40 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 07/10] xen:x86:: support xc_reserved_device_memory_map in compat case Tiejun Chen
2014-09-02 8:35 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 2:13 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 08/10] tools:firmware:hvmloader: introduce hypercall for xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-09-02 8:37 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 09/10] tools:firmware:hvmloader: check to reserve RMRR mappings in e820 Tiejun Chen
2014-09-02 8:47 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 3:04 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-04 4:32 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-04 6:36 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-26 11:03 ` [v5][PATCH 10/10] xen:vtd: make USB RMRR mapping safe Tiejun Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=540594F2.4000406@intel.com \
--to=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).