xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com,
	stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
	yang.z.zhang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [v5][PATCH 03/10] xen:x86: define a new hypercall to get RMRR mappings
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:31:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5406D1E1.3050601@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540672A7.9050000@intel.com>

On 2014/9/3 9:45, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> On 2014/9/2 21:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 02.09.14 at 13:10, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>> On 2014/9/2 18:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>> On 02.09.14 at 11:59, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>> +    case XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map:
>>>>> +    {
>>>>> +        struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory *xmrdm = NULL;
>>>>> +        struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map xmrdmm;
>>>>> +        XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t) buffer;
>>>>> +        XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t)
>>>>> buffer_param;
>>>>> +        const struct iommu_ops *ops = iommu_get_ops();
>>>>> +        unsigned int nr_entries = 0;
>>>>> +        unsigned int i = 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +        xmrdm = ops->get_device_reserved_memory(&nr_entries);
>>>
>>> Do we still need this iommu_ops somewhere else?
>>
>> Not this one, but another one (as I had described further down).
>>
>>>>> +        if ( !nr_entries )
>>>
>>> Do we still need this 'nr_entries' here?
>>
>> Doesn't look like so. But it's you coding this up - you ought to clearly
>> see what is needed and what not.
>>
>
> I mean we need to get 'nr_entries' before any real operations since if
> that is zero, any following operations are pointless. And even that is
> nonzero, but actually the user don't know how many buffer should be
> passed, so often we may need to notify user again at the first time then
> the user call this again with a appropriate buffer. Right?
>
> So how do we get this 'nr_entries'? Seems we have to to go VT-D stuff to
> walk that list or other similar approaches. If so, why we still get
> those real mapping entries later by accessing VT-D stuff again?
>
> Shouldn't we figure out a approach we just call one time?
>

I update this patch based on this point:

xen/x86: define a hypercall to expose device reserved memory maps

We need such a new hypercall to get all device reserved memory
maps, then we can check if these maps are overlapping MMIO/RAM.
Note currently just address RMRR issue.

Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
---
  xen/arch/x86/mm.c                  | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++
  xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c | 41 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  xen/include/public/memory.h        | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  xen/include/xen/mm.h               |  3 +++
  4 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
index d23cb3f..db3345b 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
@@ -180,6 +180,14 @@ static uint32_t base_disallow_mask;
        is_pv_domain(d)) ?                                        \
       L1_DISALLOW_MASK : (L1_DISALLOW_MASK & ~PAGE_CACHE_ATTRS))

+extern int
+do_copy_device_reserved_memory(struct 
xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map *xmrdmmap);
+static int
+copy_drmmap_to_guest(drmmap_callback_t f, struct 
xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map *xmrdmmap)
+{
+    return f(xmrdmmap);
+}
+
  static void __init init_frametable_chunk(void *start, void *end)
  {
      unsigned long s = (unsigned long)start;
@@ -4842,6 +4850,21 @@ long arch_memory_op(unsigned long cmd, 
XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
          return rc;
      }

+    case XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map:
+    {
+        struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map xmrdmmap;
+
+        if ( copy_from_guest(&xmrdmmap, arg, 1) )
+            return -EFAULT;
+
+        rc = copy_drmmap_to_guest(do_copy_device_reserved_memory, 
&xmrdmmap);
+
+        if ( __copy_to_guest(arg, &xmrdmmap, 1) )
+                rc = -EFAULT;
+
+        return rc;
+    }
+
      default:
          return subarch_memory_op(cmd, arg);
      }
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c 
b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
index 1152c3a..6bc5def 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
  #include <xen/xmalloc.h>
  #include <xen/pci.h>
  #include <xen/pci_regs.h>
+#include <xen/guest_access.h>
  #include <asm/string.h>
  #include "dmar.h"
  #include "iommu.h"
@@ -681,6 +682,46 @@ acpi_parse_one_rmrr(struct acpi_dmar_header *header)
      return ret;
  }

+int
+do_copy_device_reserved_memory(struct 
xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map *xmrdmmap)
+{
+    struct acpi_rmrr_unit *rmrru;
+    struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory xmrdm;
+    int i = 0, rc = 0;
+    XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t) buffer_param;
+    XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t) buffer;
+
+    if ( list_empty(&acpi_rmrr_units) )
+        return -ENOENT;
+
+    buffer_param = guest_handle_cast(xmrdmmap->buffer,
+                                     xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t);
+    buffer = guest_handle_from_param(buffer_param,
+                                     xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t);
+    if ( !guest_handle_okay(buffer, xmrdmmap->nr_entries) )
+        return -EFAULT;
+
+    list_for_each_entry(rmrru, &acpi_rmrr_units, list)
+    {
+        if ( i < xmrdmmap->nr_entries )
+        {
+            xmrdm.start_pfn = rmrru->base_address >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+            xmrdm.nr_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(rmrru->end_address -
+                                        rmrru->base_address) /
+                                        PAGE_SIZE;
+            if ( __copy_to_guest_offset(buffer, i, &xmrdm, 1) )
+                return -EFAULT;
+        }
+        else
+            rc = -ENOBUFS;
+        i++;
+    }
+
+    xmrdmmap->nr_entries = i;
+
+    return rc;
+}
+
  static int __init
  acpi_parse_one_atsr(struct acpi_dmar_header *header)
  {
diff --git a/xen/include/public/memory.h b/xen/include/public/memory.h
index 2c57aa0..628c99c 100644
--- a/xen/include/public/memory.h
+++ b/xen/include/public/memory.h
@@ -523,7 +523,42 @@ DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_mem_sharing_op_t);

  #endif /* defined(__XEN__) || defined(__XEN_TOOLS__) */

-/* Next available subop number is 26 */
+/*
+ * For legacy reasons, some devices must be configured with special memory
+ * regions to function correctly. The guest must avoid using any of these
+ * regions.
+ *
+ * - Reserved memory Region Reporting Structure,
+ * So returns the device reserved memory map as it was when the domain
+ * was started.
+ */
+#define XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map   26
+struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory {
+    /* Start PFN of the current mapping of the page. */
+    xen_pfn_t start_pfn;
+    /* Number of the current mapping pages. */
+    xen_ulong_t nr_pages;
+};
+typedef struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory 
xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t;
+DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t);
+
+struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map {
+    /*
+     * On call the number of entries which can be stored in buffer. On
+     * return the number of entries which have been stored in
+     * buffer.
+     */
+    unsigned int nr_entries;
+
+    /*
+     * xen_mem_reserved_device_memory entries in the buffer.
+     */
+    XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t) buffer;
+};
+typedef struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map 
xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map_t;
+DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map_t);
+
+/* Next available subop number is 27 */

  #endif /* __XEN_PUBLIC_MEMORY_H__ */

diff --git a/xen/include/xen/mm.h b/xen/include/xen/mm.h
index b183189..4fceafd 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/mm.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/mm.h
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
  #include <xen/types.h>
  #include <xen/list.h>
  #include <xen/spinlock.h>
+#include <public/memory.h>

  struct domain;
  struct page_info;
@@ -371,4 +372,6 @@ int guest_remove_page(struct domain *d, unsigned 
long gmfn);
  /* TRUE if the whole page at @mfn is of the requested RAM type(s) 
above. */
  int page_is_ram_type(unsigned long mfn, unsigned long mem_type);

+typedef int (*drmmap_callback_t)(struct 
xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map *xmrdmmap);
+
  #endif /* __XEN_MM_H__ */
-- 
1.9.1

Thanks
Tiejun

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-03  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-26 11:02 [v5][PATCH 0/10] xen: reserve RMRR to avoid conflicting MMIO/RAM Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 01/10] xen:vtd:rmrr: export acpi_rmrr_units Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 02/10] xen:vtd:rmrr: introduce acpi_rmrr_unit_entries Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 03/10] xen:x86: define a new hypercall to get RMRR mappings Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 12:02   ` Andrew Cooper
2014-08-26 12:37     ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-27  1:37       ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-27  6:51         ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-27  7:21           ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28  2:24             ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28  6:50               ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-28  7:09                 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28  7:19                   ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28  7:29                     ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28  7:44                     ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-29  3:02                       ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-29  9:18                         ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-01  9:44                           ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-01 10:29                             ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-02  9:59                               ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-02 10:15                                 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-02 11:10                                   ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-02 13:15                                     ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-03  1:45                                       ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03  8:31                                         ` Chen, Tiejun [this message]
2014-09-03  8:41                                           ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-03  8:59                                             ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03  9:01                                               ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03  9:54                                                 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03 12:54                                             ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04  1:15                                               ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03  8:35                                         ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-27  1:15     ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-02  8:25   ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 04/10] tools:libxc: introduce hypercall for xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 05/10] tools:libxc: check if mmio BAR is out of RMRR mappings Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 06/10] hvm_info_table: introduce nr_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-09-02  8:34   ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04  2:07     ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-04  6:32       ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04  6:55         ` Chen, Tiejun
     [not found]           ` <54082E3B0200007800030BCB@mail.emea.novell.com>
2014-09-09  6:40             ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 07/10] xen:x86:: support xc_reserved_device_memory_map in compat case Tiejun Chen
2014-09-02  8:35   ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04  2:13     ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 08/10] tools:firmware:hvmloader: introduce hypercall for xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-09-02  8:37   ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 09/10] tools:firmware:hvmloader: check to reserve RMRR mappings in e820 Tiejun Chen
2014-09-02  8:47   ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04  3:04     ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-04  4:32       ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-04  6:36       ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-26 11:03 ` [v5][PATCH 10/10] xen:vtd: make USB RMRR mapping safe Tiejun Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5406D1E1.3050601@intel.com \
    --to=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    --cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).