From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com,
stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
yang.z.zhang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [v5][PATCH 03/10] xen:x86: define a new hypercall to get RMRR mappings
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:31:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5406D1E1.3050601@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540672A7.9050000@intel.com>
On 2014/9/3 9:45, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> On 2014/9/2 21:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 02.09.14 at 13:10, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>> On 2014/9/2 18:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>> On 02.09.14 at 11:59, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>> + case XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map:
>>>>> + {
>>>>> + struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory *xmrdm = NULL;
>>>>> + struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map xmrdmm;
>>>>> + XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t) buffer;
>>>>> + XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t)
>>>>> buffer_param;
>>>>> + const struct iommu_ops *ops = iommu_get_ops();
>>>>> + unsigned int nr_entries = 0;
>>>>> + unsigned int i = 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + xmrdm = ops->get_device_reserved_memory(&nr_entries);
>>>
>>> Do we still need this iommu_ops somewhere else?
>>
>> Not this one, but another one (as I had described further down).
>>
>>>>> + if ( !nr_entries )
>>>
>>> Do we still need this 'nr_entries' here?
>>
>> Doesn't look like so. But it's you coding this up - you ought to clearly
>> see what is needed and what not.
>>
>
> I mean we need to get 'nr_entries' before any real operations since if
> that is zero, any following operations are pointless. And even that is
> nonzero, but actually the user don't know how many buffer should be
> passed, so often we may need to notify user again at the first time then
> the user call this again with a appropriate buffer. Right?
>
> So how do we get this 'nr_entries'? Seems we have to to go VT-D stuff to
> walk that list or other similar approaches. If so, why we still get
> those real mapping entries later by accessing VT-D stuff again?
>
> Shouldn't we figure out a approach we just call one time?
>
I update this patch based on this point:
xen/x86: define a hypercall to expose device reserved memory maps
We need such a new hypercall to get all device reserved memory
maps, then we can check if these maps are overlapping MMIO/RAM.
Note currently just address RMRR issue.
Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/mm.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++
xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c | 41
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
xen/include/public/memory.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
xen/include/xen/mm.h | 3 +++
4 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
index d23cb3f..db3345b 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
@@ -180,6 +180,14 @@ static uint32_t base_disallow_mask;
is_pv_domain(d)) ? \
L1_DISALLOW_MASK : (L1_DISALLOW_MASK & ~PAGE_CACHE_ATTRS))
+extern int
+do_copy_device_reserved_memory(struct
xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map *xmrdmmap);
+static int
+copy_drmmap_to_guest(drmmap_callback_t f, struct
xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map *xmrdmmap)
+{
+ return f(xmrdmmap);
+}
+
static void __init init_frametable_chunk(void *start, void *end)
{
unsigned long s = (unsigned long)start;
@@ -4842,6 +4850,21 @@ long arch_memory_op(unsigned long cmd,
XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
return rc;
}
+ case XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map:
+ {
+ struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map xmrdmmap;
+
+ if ( copy_from_guest(&xmrdmmap, arg, 1) )
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ rc = copy_drmmap_to_guest(do_copy_device_reserved_memory,
&xmrdmmap);
+
+ if ( __copy_to_guest(arg, &xmrdmmap, 1) )
+ rc = -EFAULT;
+
+ return rc;
+ }
+
default:
return subarch_memory_op(cmd, arg);
}
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
index 1152c3a..6bc5def 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <xen/xmalloc.h>
#include <xen/pci.h>
#include <xen/pci_regs.h>
+#include <xen/guest_access.h>
#include <asm/string.h>
#include "dmar.h"
#include "iommu.h"
@@ -681,6 +682,46 @@ acpi_parse_one_rmrr(struct acpi_dmar_header *header)
return ret;
}
+int
+do_copy_device_reserved_memory(struct
xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map *xmrdmmap)
+{
+ struct acpi_rmrr_unit *rmrru;
+ struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory xmrdm;
+ int i = 0, rc = 0;
+ XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t) buffer_param;
+ XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t) buffer;
+
+ if ( list_empty(&acpi_rmrr_units) )
+ return -ENOENT;
+
+ buffer_param = guest_handle_cast(xmrdmmap->buffer,
+ xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t);
+ buffer = guest_handle_from_param(buffer_param,
+ xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t);
+ if ( !guest_handle_okay(buffer, xmrdmmap->nr_entries) )
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(rmrru, &acpi_rmrr_units, list)
+ {
+ if ( i < xmrdmmap->nr_entries )
+ {
+ xmrdm.start_pfn = rmrru->base_address >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ xmrdm.nr_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(rmrru->end_address -
+ rmrru->base_address) /
+ PAGE_SIZE;
+ if ( __copy_to_guest_offset(buffer, i, &xmrdm, 1) )
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+ else
+ rc = -ENOBUFS;
+ i++;
+ }
+
+ xmrdmmap->nr_entries = i;
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
static int __init
acpi_parse_one_atsr(struct acpi_dmar_header *header)
{
diff --git a/xen/include/public/memory.h b/xen/include/public/memory.h
index 2c57aa0..628c99c 100644
--- a/xen/include/public/memory.h
+++ b/xen/include/public/memory.h
@@ -523,7 +523,42 @@ DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_mem_sharing_op_t);
#endif /* defined(__XEN__) || defined(__XEN_TOOLS__) */
-/* Next available subop number is 26 */
+/*
+ * For legacy reasons, some devices must be configured with special memory
+ * regions to function correctly. The guest must avoid using any of these
+ * regions.
+ *
+ * - Reserved memory Region Reporting Structure,
+ * So returns the device reserved memory map as it was when the domain
+ * was started.
+ */
+#define XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map 26
+struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory {
+ /* Start PFN of the current mapping of the page. */
+ xen_pfn_t start_pfn;
+ /* Number of the current mapping pages. */
+ xen_ulong_t nr_pages;
+};
+typedef struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory
xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t;
+DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t);
+
+struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map {
+ /*
+ * On call the number of entries which can be stored in buffer. On
+ * return the number of entries which have been stored in
+ * buffer.
+ */
+ unsigned int nr_entries;
+
+ /*
+ * xen_mem_reserved_device_memory entries in the buffer.
+ */
+ XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t) buffer;
+};
+typedef struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map
xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map_t;
+DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map_t);
+
+/* Next available subop number is 27 */
#endif /* __XEN_PUBLIC_MEMORY_H__ */
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/mm.h b/xen/include/xen/mm.h
index b183189..4fceafd 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/mm.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/mm.h
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
#include <xen/types.h>
#include <xen/list.h>
#include <xen/spinlock.h>
+#include <public/memory.h>
struct domain;
struct page_info;
@@ -371,4 +372,6 @@ int guest_remove_page(struct domain *d, unsigned
long gmfn);
/* TRUE if the whole page at @mfn is of the requested RAM type(s)
above. */
int page_is_ram_type(unsigned long mfn, unsigned long mem_type);
+typedef int (*drmmap_callback_t)(struct
xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map *xmrdmmap);
+
#endif /* __XEN_MM_H__ */
--
1.9.1
Thanks
Tiejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-03 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-26 11:02 [v5][PATCH 0/10] xen: reserve RMRR to avoid conflicting MMIO/RAM Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 01/10] xen:vtd:rmrr: export acpi_rmrr_units Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 02/10] xen:vtd:rmrr: introduce acpi_rmrr_unit_entries Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 03/10] xen:x86: define a new hypercall to get RMRR mappings Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 12:02 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-08-26 12:37 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-27 1:37 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-27 6:51 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-27 7:21 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28 2:24 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28 6:50 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-28 7:09 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28 7:19 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28 7:29 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28 7:44 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-29 3:02 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-29 9:18 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-01 9:44 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-01 10:29 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-02 9:59 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-02 10:15 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-02 11:10 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-02 13:15 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-03 1:45 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03 8:31 ` Chen, Tiejun [this message]
2014-09-03 8:41 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-03 8:59 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03 9:01 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03 9:54 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03 12:54 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 1:15 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-03 8:35 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-27 1:15 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-02 8:25 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 04/10] tools:libxc: introduce hypercall for xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 05/10] tools:libxc: check if mmio BAR is out of RMRR mappings Tiejun Chen
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 06/10] hvm_info_table: introduce nr_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-09-02 8:34 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 2:07 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-04 6:32 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 6:55 ` Chen, Tiejun
[not found] ` <54082E3B0200007800030BCB@mail.emea.novell.com>
2014-09-09 6:40 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 07/10] xen:x86:: support xc_reserved_device_memory_map in compat case Tiejun Chen
2014-09-02 8:35 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 2:13 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 08/10] tools:firmware:hvmloader: introduce hypercall for xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-09-02 8:37 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-26 11:02 ` [v5][PATCH 09/10] tools:firmware:hvmloader: check to reserve RMRR mappings in e820 Tiejun Chen
2014-09-02 8:47 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 3:04 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-04 4:32 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-04 6:36 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-26 11:03 ` [v5][PATCH 10/10] xen:vtd: make USB RMRR mapping safe Tiejun Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5406D1E1.3050601@intel.com \
--to=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).