From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [RFC Patch v3 03/18] don't zero out ioreq page Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 11:45:43 +0100 Message-ID: <54099457.4040603@citrix.com> References: <1409908261-18682-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> <1409908261-18682-4-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1409908261-18682-4-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wen Congyang , xen devel Cc: Ian Campbell , Ian Jackson , Jiang Yunhong , Dong Eddie , Paul Durrant , Yang Hongyang , Lai Jiangshan List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 05/09/14 10:10, Wen Congyang wrote: > ioreq page may contain some pending I/O requests, and we need to > handle the pending I/O req after migration. > > TODO: > 1. update qemu to handle the pending I/O req Under what conditions can there be pending I/O? A domain suspend should not complete until any I/O accesses are complete. Suspending a domain that's part-way through an instruction seems mad to me -- how are you supposed to capture this sort of state? David